Habbox Habbo rules

[wixard]

i haven't had a help desk ban in years lol

[LiquidLuck.]

No, not many people have lots of time before their event, some book at last minute, also you'd have to look at the thread as you're saying temporary ban them from Habbox Events, that means all EOs not just one so yes it would take time. A fail in the matter is, if you have walls covering the doorway and don't have VIP you probably can't tell who is in your room without removing the wall, thus taking more time. Just like the ban thread you'd need.

Not all events are booked at the last minute and shouldn't be so I don't see why even bring up those, to be honest. And looking at that thread would take what? Another 2mins? How is that some precious time lost or anything? It'd be the time of getting people to come to the room and enter the playing area.
About knowing who is or isn't in the room, most hosts don't have walls or have wired so that's a problem solved.

---------- Post added 07-10-2012 at 10:23 PM ----------

It's too much hassle to set up some sort of 'Habbox Event Ban List', especially when they can create other accounts, when you can simply use ignore.

Would you say that about the Help Desk? Obviously not. So why say it about Events? Exactly the same can happen.

---------- Post added 07-10-2012 at 10:24 PM ----------

i haven't had a help desk ban in years lol

Not true actually. You had a 2 hours ban in the 18th of last month.

[Samantha]

Not all events are booked at the last minute and shouldn't be so I don't see why even bring up those, to be honest. And looking at that thread would take what? Another 2mins? How is that some precious time lost or anything? It'd be the time of getting people to come to the room and enter the playing area.
About knowing who is or isn't in the room, most hosts don't have walls or have wired so that's a problem solved.

---------- Post added 07-10-2012 at 10:23 PM ----------



Would you say that about the Help Desk? Obviously not. So why say it about Events? Exactly the same can happen.

LMAO at you twisting my words, I never said ALL were booked at the last minute, you BROUGHT IT UP in the first place so I'm obviously going to reply. Yes, two minutes, if there's a lot on the ban list that would happen a lot in the event, you wouldn't just have to look before a round, people come in and out of events all the time and rooms for that matter. It's a rule that is so not needed in events, it's pointless just because of your personal experience.

[Kardan]

Not all events are booked at the last minute and shouldn't be so I don't see why even bring up those, to be honest. And looking at that thread would take what? Another 2mins? How is that some precious time lost or anything? It'd be the time of getting people to come to the room and enter the playing area.
About knowing who is or isn't in the room, most hosts don't have walls or have wired so that's a problem solved.

---------- Post added 07-10-2012 at 10:23 PM ----------



Would you say that about the Help Desk? Obviously not. So why say it about Events? Exactly the same can happen.

---------- Post added 07-10-2012 at 10:24 PM ----------



Not true actually. You had a 2 hours ban in the 18th of last month.

Yes, I would say it about the help desk - it would be too much hassle to have a list of 'Ban these people from the help desk:', of course it doesn't take too much common sense for the [people on duty to just have a 'ban on sight' until they're off duty - events are all individual, so it's too much hassle to arrange something that is cross-events.

Just use ignore, it's plain and simple.

[Samantha]

Yes, I would say it about the help desk - it would be too much hassle to have a list of 'Ban these people from the help desk:', of course it doesn't take too much common sense for the [people on duty to just have a 'ban on sight' until they're off duty - events are all individual, so it's too much hassle to arrange something that is cross-events.

Just use ignore, it's plain and simple.

That, individual is the word I've needed. I remember when I was in the Help Desk we did have a list of banned people. Also, @LiquidLuck.; persistent rule break on Habbo(xForum) may get you on DNHL.

[sex]

Not all events are booked at the last minute and shouldn't be so I don't see why even bring up those, to be honest. And looking at that thread would take what? Another 2mins? How is that some precious time lost or anything? It'd be the time of getting people to come to the room and enter the playing area.
About knowing who is or isn't in the room, most hosts don't have walls or have wired so that's a problem solved.

---------- Post added 07-10-2012 at 10:23 PM ----------



Would you say that about the Help Desk? Obviously not. So why say it about Events? Exactly the same can happen.

---------- Post added 07-10-2012 at 10:24 PM ----------





Not true actually. You had a 2 hours ban in the 18th of last month.

Well there goes you whole "not targeting anyone theory" and im pretty sure that ban was rejected? If not why are you posting private info about bans in public, or is this allowed? @Ms.Aquamarine;

Just the ignore button like everyone is saying, its not a problem for anyone else. If she is rude in you events use the warning system

[LiquidLuck.]

LMAO at you twisting my words, I never said ALL were booked at the last minute, you BROUGHT IT UP in the first place so I'm obviously going to reply. Yes, two minutes, if there's a lot on the ban list that would happen a lot in the event, you wouldn't just have to look before a round, people come in and out of events all the time and rooms for that matter. It's a rule that is so not needed in events, it's pointless just because of your personal experience.

EVents shouldn't be booked at the last minute and if they are, like I said, it wouldn't take more than 2mins to check the thread. Also, I don't see how I twisted your words and I didn't bring last minute events up?
Also obviously an Events Ban List wouldn't be that long. There would be what? 2 people top in a very offensive week? Also I understand bans wouldn't be extra long, but I think more than the time of the one event occurring is needed or someone will be just really rude at the end of it and obviously get away with it.
Hosts would need to check it once before their events and that would be it. I don't see why you bring up the need of checking it more (if that's what you meant in the 2nd, 3rd line, I didn't really get it).

---------- Post added 07-10-2012 at 10:33 PM ----------

Yes, I would say it about the help desk - it would be too much hassle to have a list of 'Ban these people from the help desk:', of course it doesn't take too much common sense for the [people on duty to just have a 'ban on sight' until they're off duty - events are all individual, so it's too much hassle to arrange something that is cross-events.

Just use ignore, it's plain and simple.

But as you obviously know, there IS a Help Desk Ban List.. so doing it for EVents would just take the same time which everything does. If you want to change anything, of course it takes time. It's not a reason not to do it.

[Kardan]

EVents shouldn't be booked at the last minute and if they are, like I said, it wouldn't take more than 2mins to check the thread. Also, I don't see how I twisted your words and I didn't bring last minute events up?
Also obviously an Events Ban List wouldn't be that long. There would be what? 2 people top in a very offensive week? Also I understand bans wouldn't be extra long, but I think more than the time of the one event occurring is needed or someone will be just really rude at the end of it and obviously get away with it.
Hosts would need to check it once before their events and that would be it. I don't see why you bring up the need of checking it more (if that's what you meant in the 2nd, 3rd line, I didn't really get it).

If the list would only be 2 people top, then what would be the point to waste 2 minutes before each event looking at it?

[LiquidLuck.]

That, individual is the word I've needed. I remember when I was in the Help Desk we did have a list of banned people. Also, @LiquidLuck.; persistent rule break on Habbo(xForum) may get you on DNHL.

Okay, imagine I'm a member of Habbox for 3 years and I don't plan on applying for any job. I can go around being rude in every other Event just because there will be NO consequences? I can be rude to staff? Racist to other users? How can you tell me that is fair?

[xxMATTGxx]

Moderating events similar to the Help Desk will always be a difficult job to do. I would say if someone is being very rude or abusive to a number of people in the room then the host will most likely deal with the situation. But if one of the those cases where it is aimed at one person then some times it can be quite hard to see and if the host is busy concentrating on the actual game which I would expect then you can't really blame them. Having two people in each event as a requirement while one hosts and the other moderates is going to be a no - Well I'm not saying you can't do it but it's not going to be forced.

Just report the user to the moderators in the client and even ignore the user if needed. Now if this person is causing trouble in a lot of Habbox events or Help Desk then please do contact a member of General Management or Events Management about the situation. We have in the past banned people from even taking part in events but that is only done on the more serious cases and them doing it in a multiple events and causing issues for everyone.