Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 29 of 29
  1. #21
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    24,818
    Tokens
    64,172
    Habbo
    FlyingJesus

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Making a choice not to act on an impulse is not the same thing as that avoided act being inherently harmful. Going back to broccoli as an example, if someone doesn't like broccoli they can still make the choice to eat it if they force themselves but it's not actually harmful to anyone either way, and that's the same with homosexuality. The same cannot be said of paedophilia because there is always at least one victim when those urges are acted upon, and therefore the act itself is harmful
    | TWITTER |



    Blessed be
    + * + * + * +

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,957
    Tokens
    3,649
    Habbo
    Pyroka

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    To read all that is really interesting. It's comical I know that this grabbed my attention, but it's the sort of debate that gets shunned on & nobody talks about due to it being pure taboo. Gay marriage was very much like that, nobody would dare utter the word but hey look at the world now. Difference is though, people accepted Gays way before whereas this sort of thing is shunned worldwide.

    I'm intrigued on where this debate goes, I don't think any laws will be changed as there are some despicable people in this world who would hurt children for their own sexual gains, but for this to be spoken about in a sensible manner is a breath of fresh air.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Middlesbrough, England
    Posts
    9,336
    Tokens
    10,837

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    How is it sensible? It just reinforces that terrible stereotype that men think about sex, sex, sex. A stupid idea that means that people wonder about a ulterior motive when you try to work in childcare or teaching.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,957
    Tokens
    3,649
    Habbo
    Pyroka

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Inseriousity. View Post
    How is it sensible? It just reinforces that terrible stereotype that men think about sex, sex, sex. A stupid idea that means that people wonder about a ulterior motive when you try to work in childcare or teaching.
    Given those people talking about that likely know there's such people who are asexual, I doubt that is their intention. Might be a by-product of it, but I think it's something to discuss. The amount of times I hear about young lads dating girls who look much older than they actually are. I'm aware of whose underage around here and whose not because I used to work in a damn school, and I pull up my mates tons of times like yeah she's a LOT younger than she looks (for clarity, some of these girls look 17-18 and are wearing bikinis everywhere). But it's the guys fault that they find that attractive I guess, Bikinis are all about function >.>

  5. #25
    -:Undertaker:-'s Avatar
    -:Undertaker:- is offline Habbox Hall of Fame Inductee
    Former Rare Values Manager
    HabboxForum Top Poster


    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Jerez, the Kingdom of Spain
    Country
    Spain
    Posts
    30,181
    Tokens
    297
    Habbo
    -:overtaker:-

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chippiewill View Post
    Why?
    Because otherwise people will bend morality to whatever suits them. I feel or want X so i'll say that Y is now moral, as we've now seen with the sky high abortion rates in which thousands of babies are butchered every year, as well as the rise of STDs (among gay and straight).

    Without a moral code, which I believe Christianity provided the best one, you get relative morality which is incredibly dangerous.


    And if you wanna buy me flowers
    Just go ahead now
    And if you like to talk for hours
    Just go ahead now


  6. #26
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    24,818
    Tokens
    64,172
    Habbo
    FlyingJesus

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    A moral code still needs to actually make sense and not just be NO IT'S WRONG BECAUSE
    | TWITTER |



    Blessed be
    + * + * + * +

  7. #27
    -:Undertaker:-'s Avatar
    -:Undertaker:- is offline Habbox Hall of Fame Inductee
    Former Rare Values Manager
    HabboxForum Top Poster


    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Jerez, the Kingdom of Spain
    Country
    Spain
    Posts
    30,181
    Tokens
    297
    Habbo
    -:overtaker:-

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FlyingJesus View Post
    A moral code still needs to actually make sense and not just be NO IT'S WRONG BECAUSE
    And again I would say that the STD/HIV rates speak for themselves.


    And if you wanna buy me flowers
    Just go ahead now
    And if you like to talk for hours
    Just go ahead now


  8. #28
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    24,818
    Tokens
    64,172
    Habbo
    FlyingJesus

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Aaaaaaaaand again we're back to your belief that gay sex magically creates STDs
    | TWITTER |



    Blessed be
    + * + * + * +

  9. #29
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    10,481
    Tokens
    3,140

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by -:Undertaker:- View Post
    Because otherwise people will bend morality to whatever suits them. I feel or want X so i'll say that Y is now moral, as we've now seen with the sky high abortion rates in which thousands of babies are butchered every year, as well as the rise of STDs (among gay and straight).

    Without a moral code, which I believe Christianity provided the best one, you get relative morality which is incredibly dangerous.
    You can't justify having a moral code by saying immoral things will happen without it.
    Chippiewill.


Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •