noooooooooooooo!

it has exactly the shading but recoloured.....
You're fighting a losing battle. give up.
I direct you all to my post at the bottom of page 2
USING SOMONES ALT WITHOUT PERMISSION IS RIPPING
---
Yea i got it :] still idk i should be happy.. But after i signed papers.... It was parked in enterence way and i didnt know if he cared if i went out it or went out the exit... So i reveresed it a little bit and "BUMPED" the front of a mustang... Neither car had damage it was accident :rolleyes: but idk i still just feel really odd about hitting itidk i like it but idk omg idk.....
theyre thr same because i drew it same shapeOriginally Posted by Cptn.kewl
The shading is the same
THe lines are the same
The arm is in the same position
There is part of the shadow of the axe from corbyns in there
There is part of the squares from corbyn's alt in there
Shading and everything is the same
If you argue with that...
Your arguing with solid proof
And you cant say you have never ripped because you have
There is still the picture of the lion on your guards shield from corbyn's alt
-.-
above answers tht
we did the axe shadow as the weapon were goin to dos shadow
we thought tht was part of shdow
we used shading as i said.
im just proving my innocence.
Why use someone elses shape when you can make your own? using someone elses shape without permission is ripping.
why do you rip??? its not hard or nefin inti!!!
Your not innocent sorry
Your guilty of stealing corbyn's work
You may have recoloured and altered it but without permission, without giving credit to him
---
Yea i got it :] still idk i should be happy.. But after i signed papers.... It was parked in enterence way and i didnt know if he cared if i went out it or went out the exit... So i reveresed it a little bit and "BUMPED" the front of a mustang... Neither car had damage it was accident :rolleyes: but idk i still just feel really odd about hitting itidk i like it but idk omg idk.....
Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!