More / Better Moderators needed.

[Catzsy]

How about having a section of people chosen by the management who seem like they could do a good job and have good reasons to be chosen and then a final decision of the who the best few would be decided by the public. Maybe limit voting to people who have been with the forum for a few months to make sure no one creates multiple account or tries to rig the election? That way only people the public respect are voted in but at the same time the management can make a good decision on who is best for the job? I'm not sure if that would be a good way of choosing who could take these positions.

Why chosen by the management? There is nothing stopping them nominating along with the members is there? Why be wary of an open system on the forum?

[today]

Why chosen by the management? There is nothing stopping them nominating along with the members is there? Why be wary of an open system on the forum?

I've always said let managment choose then public voting, as it stops anyone from picking others, its a better way to do it and if managment choose 'bad ones' then they simply wont get voted for.

[Mr.OSH]

Why chosen by the management? There is nothing stopping them nominating along with the members is there? Why be wary of an open system on the forum?

I can see what you are saying I just think that if the management chose some people to start with it would prevent anyone who couldn't do the job or would be a problem to the management from being voted into the scheme however if everyone voted under one system it would be more fair, I can see what you are saying.

[Catzsy]

I can see what you are saying I just think that if the management chose some people to start with it would prevent anyone who couldn't do the job or would be a problem to the management from being voted into the scheme however if everyone voted under one system it would be more fair, I can see what you are saying.

Then I don't think it is even worth considering if it was just management - they could always have a veto if there was a real problem anyway.

[today]

Then I don't think it is even worth considering if it was just management - they could always have a veto if there was a real problem anyway.

I guess its down to MAD / Sierk to pick a way to select council members.

[Catzsy]

I guess its down to MAD / Sierk to pick a way to select council members.

Absolutely and maybe Joshuar and Nvrspk4[H] would get a say too

[today]

I think Nvrspk4 should as he seems more prt of Habbox, where as Joshuar (no offence) is more Habbox Int, so he deals with other issues?

Though both could be given the chance.

[Mr.OSH]

Absolutely and maybe Joshuar and Nvrspk4[H] would get a say too

Well we will see but I have a feeling in order to keep things balanced if this was to go ahead then there probably would be an element of selection from the management even if the members got to vote people in to some extent but that's just my opinion.

[today]

Well we will see but I have a feeling in order to keep things balanced if this was to go ahead then there probably would be an element of selection from the management even if the members got to vote people in to some extent but that's just my opinion.

Yeah, so you mean MGMT pick 10 users and 10 staff, then the public would vote from them users?

[Mr.OSH]

Yeah, so you mean MGMT pick 10 users and 10 staff, then the public would vote from them users?

Something along the lines of that idea, yes. Anyway first you'll have to see what the management make of this, I would like to see this succeed but only time will tell. I suppose as I said earlier it's worth a try and if it doesn't work then we can't say it wasn't attempted.