Moutain Dew!

[superkat]

Sorry, we wouldn't know. Very few of us have tried stagnant pond water. :rolleyes:

rofl@that + repppp

[Mentor]

Sorry, we wouldn't know. Very few of us have tried stagnant pond water. :rolleyes:

How nice, but that both failes to disprove what i said, while also being negated by the fact if you have tasted mounin due then you have tasted it...

Were you going for the most moronic comment of the week award or somthing? or are you just that moronic you dont understand how simple deduive empircal logic works "/

[RedStratocas]

It does indeed sorry to tell you.

Rumor. A woman told us in health it was untrue. How would that even be possible?

Also, I live in the US. Its over-rated. Most people in the US (even though the world-wide knowlage of Coca-Cola says otherwise) love Dr. Pepper. People only drink Mountain Dew when they want to stay awake, and now that there is Red Bull being sold EVERYWHERE, I havent even seen a MD can in ages. No offence to you guys, but I think you are a bit sidetracked by the fact it's illegal and to get your hands on one is great.

I know its an opinion of taste, but its just really strong Sprite. Nothing more.

[Mentor]

Its not illgal, it just tastes discusting. Id prefer a spirte/7up anyday, plus redbull keeps me as awake as i need to be "/

[-Wolverine]

I don't see why everyone thinks MD is so fascinating?

It's basically Sprite/7up but a much stronger version of it.

[HUGECOOL]

How nice, but that both failes to disprove what i said, while also being negated by the fact if you have tasted mounin due then you have tasted it...

Were you going for the most moronic comment of the week award or somthing? or are you just that moronic you dont understand how simple deduive empircal logic works "/

Hah, I see you never let an idea interrupt the flow of your thoughts.

It's impossible to know how something tastes like without having experienced it in the first place. How does that not disprove your feeble attempt at metaphoricity?

Lol! Now you contradict yourself by first giving a metaphorical statement, then saying its empirical logic! I don't mind at all being critiqued, but when you don't know what you're talking about in the first place, then it's just pathetic. Oh, and spell check is nice once in a while- dyslexic or not. Most repair manuals are far more interesting than you, and far less tedious to read.

How was I going for the most moronic comment of the week when you're the one tap-dancing around the idea of my argument. :/ You did nothing to defend your original idea and actually contradicted it without taking in consideration that it was flawed in the first place. Seriously, I've come across decomposing dog carcases that are less offensive to the senses than you are.

Keep typing. Maybe, someday, you'll randomly type something and it'll make sense to both you and everyone else.

[Mentor]

[COLOR="Black"]
Hah, I see you never let an idea interrupt the flow of your thoughts.

It's impossible to know how something tastes like without having experienced it in the first place. How does that not disprove your feeble attempt at metaphoricity?

Is there some website im unaware of informing you of everything i tasted?
As i find that doubful, and yourtherefor makeing the clame on an asumtion, which is inhernty false, i can now liken the above to crap.

Lol! Now you contradict yourself by first giving a metaphorical statement, then saying its empirical logic!

OK, Empircal and logic are oppsits, empircal logic is a contracdition. Metaphorica and empircal have nothing to do with each other, you cant have a metaphical exsample without it being empircaly based...

I don't mind at all being critiqued, but when you don't know what you're talking about in the first place, then it's just pathetic. Oh, and spell check is nice once in a while- dyslexic or not. Most repair manuals are far more interesting than you, and far less tedious to read.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem
And you insult my logic :rolleyes:

How was I going for the most moronic comment of the week when you're the one tap-dancing around the idea of my argument. :/ You did nothing to defend your original idea and actually contradicted it without taking in consideration that it was flawed in the first place. Seriously, I've come across decomposing dog carcases that are less offensive to the senses than you are.

I already exsplained this previosly so wont do again. The contradiction you found was just you being ignorat of the words i was useing, and my argument stands clean.
I have the empircal knolage, therefor can make the assertion twards the likeness of the two tastes. Becuse you lack the sence impressions needed to make that same assertion obviosly does not invalidate what i said previosly, hence being a stupid comment as it failed compleaty in disproveing or even remotly effecting what i said.

Keep typing. Maybe, someday, you'll randomly type something and it'll make sense to both you and everyone else.

It makes perfect sence, not being able to understand it becuse its to complex for you, isnt realy my problem "/

[Uwe]

omg. I had this for the first time a week ago, and Im addicted!

[RedStratocas]

omg. I had this for the first time a week ago, and Im addicted!

I know I dont taste for you, but it isnt that good. Try sprite, its the same thing but not urine colored and as strong.

[HUGECOOL]

Just when I think, "Surely this person has reached and encapsulates the limits of Internet tedium" you go and push the boundary even further. Let’s try to make sense out of your barely coherent writing piece.

Is there some website im unaware of informing you of everything i tasted?
As i find that doubful, and yourtherefor makeing the clame on an asumtion, which is inhernty false, i can now liken the above to crap.

So, in short, you’re denying my claim that you haven’t tasted pond water meaning you have. Would that explain your paralytic state from the neck up? I take it dyslexia was a side effect. Then again, you’re idiocy can be all-natural.

OK, Empircal and logic are oppsits, empircal logic is a contracdition. Metaphorica and empircal have nothing to do with each other, you cant have a metaphical exsample without it being empircaly based...

If empirical logic is a contradiction, then I’m right. You said I didn’t understand empirical logic, which implied that your post was composed of it.
No, not really. Metaphors are based on similarities through your senses, while empirical is a more in-depth observation based on experience.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem
And you insult my logic

Once again, you fail. My paragraph you posted was not an ad hominem argument. Why? Well, because I was not defending the issue at the time, only insulting you, which, may I say, is fairly easy to do. In fact, this argument proves your lack of basic reasoning. :/
And no, I don’t insult your logic since I’m not sure you even posses one.

I already exsplained this previosly so wont do again. The contradiction you found was just you being ignorat of the words i was useing, and my argument stands clean.
I have the empircal knolage, therefor can make the assertion twards the likeness of the two tastes. Becuse you lack the sence impressions needed to make that same assertion obviosly does not invalidate what i said previosly, hence being a stupid comment as it failed compleaty in disproveing or even remotly effecting what i said.

My contradiction? It’s actually a mutual contradiction. Take this excerpt from a study in epistemology.
“Similarly, two people can believe things that are mutually contradictory, but they cannot know (unequivocally) things that are mutually contradictory. For example, Jeff can believe the bridge safe, while Jenny believes it unsafe. But Jeff cannot know the bridge is safe and Jenny cannot know that the bridge is unsafe simultaneously. Two people cannot know contradictory things.” Theory of Knowledge 101 can explain the rest.

You never actually present a point- you parade around an idea, but never give a decent rebuttal. If there's an idea in your head, it's in solitary confinement. “/ (This short paragraph is, too, not an ad hominem argument, in case you were incapable of deriving to that conclusion for another 10 minutes.)

It makes perfect sence, not being able to understand it becuse its to complex for you, isnt realy my problem "

The word is too, and no, it isn’t complex as you think it to be. Face it- You have no argument, and you’re bringing up mediocre excuses to count as a rebuttal. Not only is it amusing to see, but it’s laughable as well. I take pride in my knowledge and it will take more than a mentally crippled idiot to even put a dent in such foundation. You are a waste of time, flesh, oxygen, and the ****** you were born from. Go outside once in a while and breathe, before your brain starts to rot from all that festering stagnation and cognitive dysfunction. But of course, you’re probably too late already.

*Sorry for derailing the thread everyone. ;p