*Debate* Should we stop using fossil fuels and move on to a new energy source?

[-:Undertaker:-]

My thoughts exactly ^_^ Things are so much easier when you don't care about anyone else.

However, I also agree with everything Undertaker put down, nuclear is the way forward. However, poor countries won't get that because Europe and the US don't let them (check out what's happened to every country that's tried to use nuclear power). That's quite unlucky for them really.

I think asia would benefit from Solar if there not allowed nuclear, But im all for Nuclear.

[You]

I would rather have a field full of windmills or solar panels rather than a shorter life expectancy because we're breathing in carbon monoxide etc. because of pollution.

I agree with you...

I'm sure a few scenery sacrifices wouldn't harm us, Afterall, We would suffer alot more if we stay with fossil fuel and ignore solar power ect..

[Herman]

I think asia would benefit from Solar if there not allowed nuclear, But im all for Nuclear.

Not all of asia is poor you know. Singapore is one of the advanced asian countries. But we're not allowed to use nuclear power because we have very limited land, we have nowhere to put the nuclear.

Anyway, yes, I agree with undertaker.

[RedStratocas]

This is why I am against nuclear power

[-:Undertaker:-]

This is why I am against nuclear power

Yeh I already knew about that, The program I wacthed included Chernobyl and once I wacthed a Drama on Chernobyl, It was so sad I nearly cried.

But as ive said before we've moved on in the past 50 - 15 Years - AND That was near/russia which is more Corrupt and 'Backwards'.

I still stand for Nuclear.

[DMB-Hosting]

Hmm theres plenty of reneable sources.

Sorry for bad spellings im itred

[Mentor]

IF we could just switch to a renewable fule sorse we already would have done.
Currently we cant. Most renable technolgys dont give anywhere near enogh power and are massivly more exspeince, as well as often being unrelatble.
The cost is more than we can afford hence we dont switch.

ps. a volcanic erupotion can emit a few 100 million tones of carbon monoside initself, and thats not even a partucaly large one.

Reneable fules also have many problems to, Wind power, many dont want ugly wind mills (apprnlty), as the sound has clamed to cause headakes, and theyve been proven to kill large amounts of birds, as well as being VERY unrelatble, and giveing very little power...
Hydro eleticic, possibly the most effective, causes havock with river echo systems, floods massive arias of land, and causes alot of damage too "/

While we still can use follissule fules, and we dont have anything thats realy better to offer, we aint gona change

[RedStratocas]

Yeh I already knew about that, The program I wacthed included Chernobyl and once I wacthed a Drama on Chernobyl, It was so sad I nearly cried.

But as ive said before we've moved on in the past 50 - 15 Years - AND That was near/russia which is more Corrupt and 'Backwards'.

I still stand for Nuclear.

I just don't trust it. There was a fire in a power plant near me a year back. I didnt expect anything major, but accedents do happen.

[RedStratocas]

IF we could just switch to a renewable fule sorse we already would have done.
Currently we cant. Most renable technolgys dont give anywhere near enogh power and are massivly more exspeince, as well as often being unrelatble.
The cost is more than we can afford hence we dont switch.

ps. a volcanic erupotion can emit a few 100 million tones of carbon monoside initself, and thats not even a partucaly large one.

Reneable fules also have many problems to, Wind power, many dont want ugly wind mills (apprnlty), as the sound has clamed to cause headakes, and theyve been proven to kill large amounts of birds, as well as being VERY unrelatble, and giveing very little power...
Hydro eleticic, possibly the most effective, causes havock with river echo systems, floods massive arias of land, and causes alot of damage too "/

While we still can use follissule fules, and we dont have anything thats realy better to offer, we aint gona change

How about solar? Most people with solar panels on their house can provide energy for themselves. I know that some people wont be able to get it as well, ubt a system of panels could supply them.

[Uber-Jason]

solar panel take more energy to make them than they give out in electricity in 10 years of use, more carbon dioxide is used to make them than would be saved by using them, solar power is not really the way forward, i think it should be nuclear energy although then where to the waste go?