View Poll Results: Graffiti art or not?

Voters
42. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    12 28.57%
  • In some places it looks good

    22 52.38%
  • No

    7 16.67%
  • Undecided

    1 2.38%
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 31 to 35 of 35
  1. #31
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    11,266
    Tokens
    8,688
    Habbo
    The-Quiet-One

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    I think some of it's art, not the stuff like peoples names in graffti writing but things like images and what not would be classed as art to me.

    There is a few builds around that have like graffti'd pictures on them, and they are really good.


  2. #32
    -:Undertaker:-'s Avatar
    -:Undertaker:- is offline Habbox Hall of Fame Inductee
    Former Rare Values Manager
    HabboxForum Top Poster


    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Liverpool, England, UK
    Country
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    30,229
    Tokens
    651
    Habbo
    -:overtaker:-

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hollywood View Post
    I agree to a certain point, around my area we have a special wall built just for graffiti art and it looks friggen good
    What a waste of taxpayer money to be honest, If I paid my taxes I would not want my council tax money to go towards a pointless wall covered in paint.

    Quote Originally Posted by Diligo View Post
    But on a canvas what do you think?
    I think modern art sucks altogether, a nice picture of a house by a lakeside is art to me, unlike some red lines and green circles all mashd in together with many other colours.


    And if you wanna buy me flowers
    Just go ahead now
    And if you like to talk for hours
    Just go ahead now


  3. #33
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    North England
    Posts
    5,718
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by -:Undertaker:- View Post
    I think modern art sucks altogether, a nice picture of a house by a lakeside is art to me, unlike some red lines and green circles all mashd in together with many other colours.
    Fair enough.

    I'm quite into the edgy-arty-designs.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    London
    Posts
    1,907
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    I think graffiti looks good in graffitti parks with the huge boards which is a huge display of free expression. but when its on the street its just vandalism, which can ruin or spoil great facilities. People who do it are dumb in a way because we pay taxes (People in England in general obviously not teenagers) for theese facilities and we reck them. so your ruining your own money.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    24,824
    Tokens
    64,201
    Habbo
    FlyingJesus

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by -:Undertaker:- View Post
    What a waste of taxpayer money to be honest, If I paid my taxes I would not want my council tax money to go towards a pointless wall covered in paint.



    I think modern art sucks altogether, a nice picture of a house by a lakeside is art to me, unlike some red lines and green circles all mashd in together with many other colours.
    Agree with top part, if people want to do art then they should buy their own space to do it. I'm an artist myself but I disagree with councils paying for some guy to spray over a stencil on a wall.

    Second part I used to agree with, then I found out that expressionism, futurism and surrealism count as modern art, and that's what I mostly paint myself ^_^ however yeah "random" bits of colour which aren't anything aren't great in my opinion, as it's the explanation of what they've done which people see as artistic and not the piece itself.
    | TWITTER |



    Blessed be
    + * + * + * +

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •