Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 31 to 33 of 33
  1. #31
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    /etc/passwd
    Posts
    19,110
    Tokens
    1,139

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    You still have to load at some points in the game.
    Quote Originally Posted by Chippiewill View Post
    e-rebel forum moderator
    :8

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    1,175
    Tokens
    3,129

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ScreamingRage01 View Post
    the reason for installation was that you never have to go through a single loading screen form start to finish on the ps3, whereas you have a load on 360.
    Now you're just making stuff up haha.

    The reason for the installation is to reduce load times, because the Blu-Ray format's read speed is incredibly slow compared to DVD. The PS3 copies data to the hard drive, therefore reducing load times but it will still need to load obviously.

    I personally don't see any difference in either version. I was playing the PS3 version last night at my friends' after I had a go of the 360 one at mines. Load times are similar, graphics are basically the same, in fact, the only thing added was the SixAxis support which I don't see the point in.

    </rant>

  3. #33

    Default

    Look at any comparitive review...

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •