Bring back the death penalty?

[Catchy]

No, but for people like paedophiles etc, torture them everyday etc. Mmmm would be hot


lol jkz

[Immenseman]

No, but for people like paedophiles etc, torture them everyday etc. Mmmm would be hot


lol jkz

Why do you say jkz lol it would be, mm.

[luce]

Why do you say jkz lol it would be, mm.

you sicken me hubby

[Nxrissa]

GOD YES they should deffo bring it back! do you think people who have killed people on purpose derserve to be alive ?

then again there are other sides if they get the wrong person. well there stuffed. but in the long term i think there should be tests and stuff to prove it was the person and then they should go and die.

[e5]

sum ppl can just have a moment on unexplained insanity, do these sort of people deserved to be killed for that? =| not really.

[Nxrissa]

true. it should be brung back but deppending on the circumstances.
some people are so sick killing babys, children adults etc. that have done no harm what so ever.

[ifuseekamy]

GOD YES they should deffo bring it back! do you think people who have killed people on purpose derserve to be alive ?

Irony overload.

[RastaLulz]

I think that if you kill someone, you should receive the death penalty regardless of the situation (unless it's in self-defense, or accidental) if you take another persons life. As why should you be granted a life, while the person you murdered doesn't get that option?

[GommeInc]

I think that if you kill someone, you should receive the death penalty regardless of the situation (unless it's in self-defense, or accidental) if you take another persons life. As why should you be granted a life, while the person you murdered doesn't get that option?

Ever heard of man slaughter? Because accidentally murdering someone comes under that Also, saying people should be legally murdered for accidentally killing someone is stupid :/ A bus driver should be killed if he survives a hugh pile up where one or more of his passengers were killed in the accident, silly much? Don't say "that's an exception" because exceptions shouldn't be taken into law because what's the point in believing in fair trials? Another good example, what if a doctor loses a patient? Should he be killed because he couldn't save someone in his care and protection?

Murder and man slaughter are different, one's intentional and the other isn't. The person who does the killing in the death penalty should be killed too by this irrational and certified brain dead logic, and the person who kills the executioner should be killed too, and so on, and so on, and so on...

Notice a problem? I do, and so do many people

[-:Undertaker:-]

However that person/s are employed by the state and the state laws would allow for that because it is state execution. It is like the sex limit, people under 16 aren't legally allowed to have sex whilst those over 16 are allowed to have sex. The law is full of exceptions and without exceptions we'd either live in the most liberal country in the world or the most harsh & irrational country in the world, neither of which we would want.