Discover Habbo's history
Treat yourself with a Secret Santa gift.... of a random Wiki page for you to start exploring Habbo's history!
Happy holidays!
Celebrate with us at Habbox on the hotel, on our Forum and right here!
Join Habbox!
One of us! One of us! Click here to see the roles you could take as part of the Habbox community!


Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 47
  1. #31
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    N. Ireland
    Posts
    7,754
    Tokens
    67

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PaulMacC View Post
    Anything compared to that pile of crap is good. Call of Duty WaW is probably one of the worst Call of Duty games. It has so many flaws it's unbelievable. You wont notice until you've played Call of Duty 4. I can easily get a 3:1 K/D each game on Call of Duty 4, an even better one if I am host or the opponents are noobs. I can get it in WaW too but so many things prevent me sometimes, makes me furious!. A list of problems I've encountered with WAW - horrible spawning, overpowered weapons, horrible host migration, horrible map design, maps are way too big. The only thing WaW has going for it is Nazi Zombies. World at War did a few things right (Taking out Frag x3 and replacing it with Frag x2, Some good new game modes) but the amount of things it did wrong overshadows that. Oh another thing, dogs dont get me started on those lol. I better shut up now, this is turning into a rant.

    On topic ;; Just another 5 days to go, hopefully. Does anyone know if it will definatly cost 1200 M$ points?
    Have any of you ever played the old CoD games? Some of them are superior to 4.

    Also, playing shooters on a console when there's a PC version available is ******* stupid. PC was, and always will be, best for shooting games.
    Last edited by Niall!; 09-07-2009 at 09:00 AM.


    Click the image.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Plymouth
    Posts
    9,406
    Tokens
    1,777

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Niall! View Post
    Have any of you ever played the old CoD games? Some of them are superior to 4.

    Also, playing shooters on a console when there's a PC version available is ******* stupid. PC was, and always will be, best for shooting games.
    It's not stupid if you don't have the money for a PC or just don't like playing games on PCs. :rolleyes:

    Also I agree on the CoD comment, CoD1 on the PC and CoD2 were amazing.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    15,252
    Tokens
    347

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    I've played CoD1 on Steam and I have CoD2 on 360.
    I liked CoD2 and CoD1 but CoD:WaW is so fail.
    No longer active on here


  4. #34
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Plymouth
    Posts
    9,406
    Tokens
    1,777

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PaulMacC View Post
    I've played CoD1 on Steam and I have CoD2 on 360.
    I liked CoD2 and CoD1 but CoD:WaW is so fail.
    It's not that bad, the graphics are awesome and the story is always a high point by Treyarch, the multiplayer was a let down since it was pretty much a carbon copy of MW so it didn't really hold my attention but the campaign is always the best part of CoD games anyway.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Reading, UK
    Posts
    3,060
    Tokens
    1,780

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    CoD2 will always be my favourite CoD game. I was always on it because it was amazing! I also prefer WaW over MW.

    I'm installing the Battlefield 1943 trial now and I'll buy it if I think it's any good.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    15,252
    Tokens
    347

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    How do you prefer WaW over MW. Thats insane.
    No longer active on here


  7. #37
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Ohio, USA
    Posts
    3,840
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PaulMacC View Post
    How do you prefer WaW over MW. Thats insane.
    Its probably cause he likes ww2. My friend likes waw better cause he likes history a lot. Kinda understandable.
    1. Jeremy 1129 up, 295 downA named based on the biblical name Jeremiah. Used as a name for children who are blessed with a large brain and/or penis. Also used as a replacement for "perfect".
    We had a child and it had a very large penis so we named it Jeremy.

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Plymouth
    Posts
    9,406
    Tokens
    1,777

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PaulMacC View Post
    How do you prefer WaW over MW. Thats insane.
    WaW is much more realistic when it comes to war aswell, shooter games should be stuck with realistic operations, not the rubbish they shelled out in CoD4, it was just plain stupid, look at the Conflict Desert Storm games, they were good examples of modern shooters.

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Nottingham
    Posts
    7,752
    Tokens
    756
    Habbo
    katie.pricejorda

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Neil View Post
    WaW is much more realistic when it comes to war aswell, shooter games should be stuck with realistic operations, not the rubbish they shelled out in CoD4, it was just plain stupid, look at the Conflict Desert Storm games, they were good examples of modern shooters.
    Depends whether you're looking for realism or not, people complain when things aren't realistic and beam at new games which look realistic however I think we all know realism doesn't make a great game, it's a combination of that and an arcade shooter. Frontlines, Battlefield Bad Company, Conflict Desert Storm etc are all very realistic compared to COD4 but I personally find the games dreadful (although a good simulator), and that's the general opinion when looking at sales.

    People think realism is good when watching trailers etc but in reality a shooter game which is an exact representation of a real war would suck.

    I think Battlefield 1943 is a good mix, it's realistic how the environment is so destructible, yet in reality it would be much easier to kill people.

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Reading, UK
    Posts
    3,060
    Tokens
    1,780

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PaulMacC View Post
    How do you prefer WaW over MW. Thats insane.
    Because I like WW2 games. WaW isn't actually as bad as everyone makes it out to be.

Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •