[Wolk] NEW MOON ALT COMPETITION: POSTER

[Wolk.]

the gradient was made in paint yes, then i added some cloud and smoke brushes to it to make it resemble the original new moon poster, sorry for trying to make something look like its supposed to

[Accipiter]

Tbf that background looks far to advance for anything made on paint.net and the moon looks like a moon with a oppacity down on photoshop added to it. I have to admit its one of the better ones, but alot of it looks like photoshop manipulation and layers.

[Kyle]

Wolk why do you feel the need to argue with people that criticise your alt lol...

[Wolk.]

lol, i made the gradient BY HAND on MICROSOFT PAINT, i.e did the first line of pattern, c+p'd to the next line, carried on the pattern, it isnt exactly hard its just learning the pattern of how it goes.
and yes as i said the cloud and the moon were brushes on photoshop?
so what, what are you trying to prove?

and kyle, ill have a go at any1 who doesnt know what theyre talking about it wasnt something i just threw together in 10 minutes it took me a while and with people telling me all these things to how its bad or w.e it gets me annoyed.

[Accipiter]

I didn't say made in 10 mins tbf.

And you've just said you did use photoshop which could have cut a long story short... And don't tell me i don't know what im talking about pls

and how could the gradients be made on paint when paint doesn't offer transparency? do you mean paint.net?

[Kyle]

lol, i made the gradient BY HAND on MICROSOFT PAINT, i.e did the first line of pattern, c+p'd to the next line, carried on the pattern, it isnt exactly hard its just learning the pattern of how it goes.
and yes as i said the cloud and the moon were brushes on photoshop?
so what, what are you trying to prove?

and kyle, ill have a go at any1 who doesnt know what theyre talking about it wasnt something i just threw together in 10 minutes it took me a while and with people telling me all these things to how its bad or w.e it gets me annoyed.

You'll probably find that the people giving constructive criticism do know what they're talking about and everybody else will point out one thing previously mentioned and rate it at either 9/10 or 7/10 because they couldn't care less about how good or bad your piece is, they just want +1 to their post count.

[Wolk.]

voiceover why cant you grasp the idea of me making a gradient by hand in microsoft paint? all you have to do is line two colours upto each other then dither them out by hand, it doesnt matter if paint doesnt offer transparency because i can do it from scratch and transparency doesnt have anything to do with it.

[Accipiter]

i would say transparency would have alot to do with it when its other quite a high quality piece behind it.

I do know how to create gradients on paint seeing as all you need to do is double click the colours and add or reduce the bar thing. Cba for technical speech. You seem to have taken to the fact i've called your alt crap at some point. All i've done is question it.

[Wolk.]

right, lets get this straight, we are talking about the very back background arent we? the one with the bars of brown fading out towards the top?

if we are, then that has nothing to do with transparency, because you can make it in ms paint by just copying and pasting the bars forming a pattern then (when zoomed out) looks like a gradient.

The background on top, i.e. the clouds and the moon, that was done on photoshop by using cloud and moon brushes and lowering the opacity, yes.

and if you call questioning, picking out flaws from someones work then stating it on their thread either to look imposing or just to insult them then yes thats all youve done.

[Accipiter]

no i just wanted to know how tbf, which i was technically right so saying i have no clue yet i can still spot when photoshop has been used.

and yeah thats what i meant on the top 3 lines, and thats what i thought.