Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 31 to 38 of 38
  1. #31
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    24,818
    Tokens
    64,172
    Habbo
    FlyingJesus

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Frankly I'm more excited for the 8th and final part than anything else simply because I want to see Julie Walters beat the **** out of Helena Bonham Carter, whom I cannot stand
    | TWITTER |



    Blessed be
    + * + * + * +

  2. #32
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    3,216
    Tokens
    475

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    For people hoping that nothing is left out, the reason it's been split into to parts is because the film would be too long otherwise, they decided that all the wonderful backplots that never make it into the movies (esp the 6th..) contributed to the overall outcome of the story enough that they couldn't leave out anything. This attests to how well written TDH is, all the smaller plots mesh in with the main story and not a word is wasted.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    24,818
    Tokens
    64,172
    Habbo
    FlyingJesus

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Yeah but half the smaller plots were left out of the other films because no-one knew they were going to be at all important
    | TWITTER |



    Blessed be
    + * + * + * +

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    9,049
    Tokens
    1,126

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wig44. View Post
    For people hoping that nothing is left out, the reason it's been split into to parts is because the film would be too long otherwise, they decided that all the wonderful backplots that never make it into the movies (esp the 6th..) contributed to the overall outcome of the story enough that they couldn't leave out anything. This attests to how well written TDH is, all the smaller plots mesh in with the main story and not a word is wasted.
    The running time will be between 3 and 4 hours, meaning 90 minute or 2 hour halves. They could have sold a 3 hour film, four hours being too long for a theatrical audience. It's all down to money, not creativity.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Lichfield
    Posts
    4,302
    Tokens
    1,877

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Why can't they show a 4 hour film?

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    9,049
    Tokens
    1,126

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    4 hours is too long for the majority of the audience, and thus deemed not financiall viable.
    Last edited by Misawa; 13-01-2010 at 04:29 PM.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    731
    Tokens
    0

    Default

    I literally cant wait for these now. I havent been disappointed with any of the films or books and I think they will do a great job on this

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    10
    Tokens
    0

    Default

    Oh my god. I'm such a huge fan of the Harry Potter-series, mostly for the reason that I grew up with these fantastic movies and awesome books. I'm looking forward on seeing the new film. It's not that long left actually! About 10 months... *drool*. This shall be very exciting to see, as the seventh book, which in my opinion is the best one is going to be installed in two different parts. Wonderful.


    And on a note of the duration of the movie, I would guess it being the length of a normal Harry Potter movie, approximately 150 minutes. Thus, being able to take in as much as possible of the 7th book which is the main reason for splitting the movies up in two parts.

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •