Discover Habbo's history
Treat yourself with a Secret Santa gift.... of a random Wiki page for you to start exploring Habbo's history!
Happy holidays!
Celebrate with us at Habbox on the hotel, on our Forum and right here!
Join Habbox!
One of us! One of us! Click here to see the roles you could take as part of the Habbox community!


Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 41
  1. #31
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    9,049
    Tokens
    1,126

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Pattinson and Lautner are strictly TV actors. They haven't the performanc ability to carry a feature film. The two Twilight films are so unfathomably awful, and not just the story, they're so poorly made, and the performances are one of the worst elements.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Birmingham
    Posts
    636
    Tokens
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Misawa View Post
    Pattinson and Lautner are strictly TV actors. They haven't the performanc ability to carry a feature film. The two Twilight films are so unfathomably awful, and not just the story, they're so poorly made, and the performances are one of the worst elements.
    urgh. So this is deffo going to be reboot? What was your role with fourth coming one?
    OOPS I DID IT AGAIN..

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    9,049
    Tokens
    1,126

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Yes, it was confirmed by Sony as a reboot when I started this thread. And no... I had no involvement.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Leeds
    Posts
    6,071
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    I'm wondering which other actors we could honestly see as Peter Parker.

    But I can't think of anyone except Maguire, he just made the role his, and he's a great actor anyway.

    This is all one bad idea, too bad the popcorn movie idiot stuffhead will still love it.

    Spiderman in the comics has always been a more interesting character than in the films, but I appreciate the themes and development he tries to squeeze in. As a comic book dork I always like those little moments where I can relate a little snippet of scenery, dialogue or character to that of the comic book. The X-Men movies did no service to the characters, except the one written by David Hayter, and the Iron Man movie was more of a giant popcorn film fest. A great film nonetheless, but still not true to the character.

    Raimi, Nolan, Burton, Del Toro and maybe a handful of other people just know how to make comic book movies work, and still stay true to the character.

    I'll be against this movie wholeheartedly, and if Pattinson is involved, I will never watch a Marvel film again.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    731
    Tokens
    0

    Default

    Robert Pattinson? Taylor Lautner? Oh dear god please no.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Birmingham
    Posts
    636
    Tokens
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Misawa View Post
    Yes, it was confirmed by Sony as a reboot when I started this thread. And no... I had no involvement.
    Ah ok.

    Quote Originally Posted by Apeel View Post
    I'm wondering which other actors we could honestly see as Peter Parker.

    But I can't think of anyone except Maguire, he just made the role his, and he's a great actor anyway.

    This is all one bad idea, too bad the popcorn movie idiot stuffhead will still love it.

    Spiderman in the comics has always been a more interesting character than in the films, but I appreciate the themes and development he tries to squeeze in. As a comic book dork I always like those little moments where I can relate a little snippet of scenery, dialogue or character to that of the comic book. The X-Men movies did no service to the characters, except the one written by David Hayter, and the Iron Man movie was more of a giant popcorn film fest. A great film nonetheless, but still not true to the character.

    Raimi, Nolan, Burton, Del Toro and maybe a handful of other people just know how to make comic book movies work, and still stay true to the character.


    I'll be against this movie wholeheartedly, and if Pattinson is involved, I will never watch a Marvel film again.
    I can't see you NEVER watching a Marvel flim again if that were to be the case.

    Ashton Kutcher as a possible candidate? I don't know imo. Tony was just great being Spiderman he's character suited the role well.

    I think they'll go for someone young, someone who's done one or two
    movies (Sci-FI) I'm guessing in the action type/hero area. Why I'm moving towards them two guys in Twightlight w/e it's called. It's going to be a difficult task finding a new cast who will be as good as the old one.

    Why don't they just bloody stick with the cast and carry on the story for goodness sakes. I hate it when people make stupid decisions.
    OOPS I DID IT AGAIN..

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    19,678
    Tokens
    11,479

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    So pissed off. Especially seeing as how John Malkovich was confirmed to play the Vulture only a week or so ago. ****! The Vulture would have been such a good villain. Plus its JOHN MALKOVICH!
    Last edited by Neversoft; 13-01-2010 at 05:46 PM.

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Leeds
    Posts
    6,071
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by United-Clowgon
    I can't see you NEVER watching a Marvel flim again if that were to be the case.
    I'm very persistant. It'll hurt for a while but I take DC over Marvel anyway. I really just stick with Marvel to see what they're doing with their whole 'Ultimate' series, some damn good writers have come out that.

    Quote Originally Posted by United-Clowgon
    Ashton Kutcher as a possible candidate? I don't know imo. Tony was just great being Spiderman he's character suited the role well.
    No thanks, Ashton is a cool guy but would not suit well in any superhero movie.

    Quote Originally Posted by United-Clowgon
    I think they'll go for someone young, someone who's done one or two
    movies (Sci-FI) I'm guessing in the action type/hero area. Why I'm moving towards them two guys in Twightlight w/e it's called.
    Twilight isn't a sci-fi movie, or action movie, it's not even a romance movie. It's just some awfully written romance thing that's supposed to teach women about love. All it really does it make Bella out to be some sort of suicidal person (because she's... you know... a girl and ends up with a musculer boyfriend?). The thing just feeds off its 14-year old, hormonal audience, there's no depth or character development. Just no substance or anything good about them.

    Pattinson is also a HORRIBLE actor.

    Quote Originally Posted by United-Clowgon
    It's going to be a difficult task finding a new cast who will be as good as the old one.
    I think this is what angers me most, aside from the fact it will totally butcher the series exploration of the character. The cast was pixel perfect, even if Kirsten Dunst was a bit wishy washy. Every performance was polished to perfection and I see absolutely nothing wrong with any of them.

    Quote Originally Posted by United-Clowgon
    Why don't they just bloody stick with the cast and carry on the story for goodness sakes. I hate it when people make stupid decisions.
    Hollywood execs are lazy, greedy and will sacrifice anything to make a good buck, they don't do it for the movies, they do it for the box office.

    Quote Originally Posted by Neversoft
    So pissed off. Especially seeing as how John Malkovich was confirmed to play the Vulture only a week or so ago. ****! The Vulture would have been such as good villain.
    I heard about that, and was excited to see the Vulture, Malkovich is just a powerhouse of great acting and he could've brought some great things to the character.

    It's all dead now, thanks Sony.

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    9,049
    Tokens
    1,126

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Ashton is way too old for the part. He would have had a good look for it when he was younger, but he's a pretty dire actor.

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    12,405
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Seriously, is there any need? Can't they just let the thing die. They can't beat the success of the original Spider-Man so why not just pick one of the countless other Marvel comics to start from scratch with? They would make a lot more money that way than even if they continued to do a Spider-Man 4.

Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •