http://www.facebook.com/pages/Drinki...3698078?ref=mf
heres the one i created todayy, would appreciate if you joinedd thanks

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Drinki...3698078?ref=mf
heres the one i created todayy, would appreciate if you joinedd thanks
You aren't the only one tbh.
Clowgon stop spurting rubbish, in the minutes between the planes there would have been no time to evacuate one of the tallest buildings in the world:rolleyes:
I created this on Tuesday, it's growing daily but I'd like it to grow faster.I think you should both should watch 'loose change' part 1-3 on Youtube - It's quite damaging for the US Government in which they say - the attacks were carried out by Osama and fellow Terrorists. They named 18 people who they claimed were behind the attacks - Many of them have come forward to say they are alive and well - Very strange.. anyway the loose change doc on youtube is quite good, i think both of your opinions will change once you watch it all.
hahahahahaha @ this group, people are so gullible. i used to get frustrated at 9/11 conspiracy theorists, now i just think it's so pathetic that its funny.
ive never made a facebook group, ive had ideas before but usually theyve been taken in some form or another even if they have only some fans.
Millions of Americans feel the say also.. hmmmm (A)
OOPS I DID IT AGAIN..
i watched loose change when it first came out, dont try and say i havent looked into the facts of 9/11. i saw the smoke from the twin towers, i was pretty heavily effected by it, at least surrounded by people who were. there are numerous, perhaps hundreds, of videos that go through each and every one of the claims made in loose change and debunks them. i know a magazine called popular mechanics, a science and engineers publication, published a lengthy book that goes through each of the conspiracy claims and talks about the science that proves them wrong. loose change was made by a college kid who doesnt know anything about science, journalism, government, or foreign policy. he has no evidence to back up his claims and often skews his evidence to further his point (for example, the picture he used of the supposedly "tiny" hole from the pentagon was significantly cropped) and he refused to acknowledge key facts. ive just started finding it funny how psychology works, people want to believe that the government did it, even if the facts say otherwise. it just makes me laugh now honestly, because of how there is ample evidence to prove these theories wrong but people dont take the time to read about it.I think you should both should watch 'loose change' part 1-3 on Youtube - It's quite damaging for the US Government in which they say - the attacks were carried out by Osama and fellow Terrorists. They named 18 people who they claimed were behind the attacks - Many of them have come forward to say they are alive and well - Very strange.. anyway the loose change doc on youtube is quite good, i think both of your opinions will change once you watch it all.
Last edited by RedStratocas; 31-01-2010 at 08:45 PM.
Loose Change was very interesting.i watched loose change when it first came out, dont try and say i havent looked into the facts of 9/11. i saw the smoke from the twin towers, i was pretty heavily effected by it, at least surrounded by people who were. there are numerous, perhaps hundreds, of videos that go through each and every one of the claims made in loose change and debunks them. i know a magazine called popular mechanics, a science and engineers publication, published a lengthy book that goes through each of the conspiracy claims and talks about the science that proves them wrong. loose change was made by a college kid who doesnt know anything about science, journalism, government, or foreign policy. he has no evidence to back up his claims and often skews his evidence to further his point (for example, the picture he used of the supposedly "tiny" hole from the pentagon was significantly cropped) and he refused to acknowledge key facts. ive just started finding it funny how psychology works, people want to believe that the government did it, even if the facts say otherwise. it just makes me laugh now honestly, because of how there is ample evidence to prove these theories wrong but people dont take the time to read about it.
Well there isn't no solid facts to prove 9/11 was done by terrorists. What happened to the people who came off that flight - 64 people got taken to a nasa site and no one knows what's happened to them?i watched loose change when it first came out, dont try and say i havent looked into the facts of 9/11. i saw the smoke from the twin towers, i was pretty heavily effected by it, at least surrounded by people who were. there are numerous, perhaps hundreds, of videos that go through each and every one of the claims made in loose change and debunks them. i know a magazine called popular mechanics, a science and engineers publication, published a lengthy book that goes through each of the conspiracy claims and talks about the science that proves them wrong. loose change was made by a college kid who doesnt know anything about science, journalism, government, or foreign policy. he has no evidence to back up his claims and often skews his evidence to further his point (for example, the picture he used of the supposedly "tiny" hole from the pentagon was significantly cropped) and he refused to acknowledge key facts. ive just started finding it funny how psychology works, people want to believe that the government did it, even if the facts say otherwise. it just makes me laugh now honestly, because of how there is ample evidence to prove these theories wrong but people dont take the time to read about it.
Why did America name 18 terrorists who were behind the attacks - of course if they were behind the attacks none of them would be alive - 9/18 of them came forward to say they were alive and well?
Why did the owner of the twin towers took out a 2.2bn insurance policy just 6 weeks before the attacks?
Why did officers claim to hear explosives going off 20 floors from where the the planes went inside the Building?
Some people are deluded to think Bush/US Gov at the time had NOTHING to do with 9/11 :rolleyes:
OOPS I DID IT AGAIN..
"Don't you just hate it when you wake up and a panda punches you in the face"
lol![]()
"There are only two important days in your life: the day you are born, and the day you find out why."
Mark Twain
Gone back to a normal life, why would they want to have what they do documentedWell there isn't no solid facts to prove 9/11 was done by terrorists. What happened to the people who came off that flight - 64 people got taken to a nasa site and no one knows what's happened to them?
This extremely poor argument proves how little evidence you and other theorist have. It's quite obvious really, with such a big thing, the govemerment neded to reassure the public they had caught who was responsible for it.Why did America name 18 terrorists who were behind the attacks - of course if they were behind the attacks none of them would be alive - 9/18 of them came forward to say they were alive and well?
Because he owned one of the biggest landmarks in the US.Why did the owner of the twin towers took out a 2.2bn insurance policy just 6 weeks before the attacks?
it would be extremely hard for them to say what they heard.Why did officers claim to hear explosives going off 20 floors from where the the planes went inside the Building?
I've seen all the conspiracy documentaries and was for a time, deluded like you. However, there is so much to prove it wasn't by the goverment.Some people are deluded to think Bush/US Gov at the time had NOTHING to do with 9/11 :rolleyes:
(h)(h)(h)
Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!