Is it right to spend £50 million protecting the Royal Family?

[iAdam]

The amount of tourism it brings it'd be a shame to see it gone. But seriously not all of the family needs protecting out of our money.

[Sharon]

lets hope william and harry have 5 kids each then.

I still don't see why they need 22 members protected maybe top 10?
Seems that duke guy its trying to spend spend spend but then again he has the money innit,

may i just say harry = fit where as william = ugleh.

[DrLacero]

The amount of tourism it brings it'd be a shame to see it gone. But seriously not all of the family needs protecting out of our money.

Keep Buckingham Palace and get Madame Tussaudes to make a new royal family and stick them inside, tourists will never know the difference.

[Grig]

I say get rid of protecting the so called 'b list', of those royals who are not direct heirs to the throne. It's right for those royals who do hold the most power, but not beyond that.