Exactly. He was angry, so he was reckless as to causing serious harm but didn't actually intend to cause it because he was so angry. Meaning he didn't intend it. At least not according to the law, anyway.
Benedictus qui venit in nomine Domini
I can see his point of view, but I still wouldn't want my child in his class, knowing that he is able to become that angry, if that makes sense.
I'm not crazy, ask my toaster.
Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!