Discover Habbo's history
Treat yourself with a Secret Santa gift.... of a random Wiki page for you to start exploring Habbo's history!
Happy holidays!
Celebrate with us at Habbox on the hotel, on our Forum and right here!
Join Habbox!
One of us! One of us! Click here to see the roles you could take as part of the Habbox community!


Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 59
  1. #31
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Cambridge, UK
    Posts
    901
    Tokens
    100

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by turtle. View Post
    Are you sure your not on about the 57?
    It is the work horse for most things?
    The 58's a bit more live stuff - think backing singers on a live stage
    Well, even though they're the same microphone with the same capsule, just a different head design, I'm pretty sure I'm talking about the 58 considering it's designed with vocals in mind
    we're smiling but we're close to tears, even after all these years

  2. #32
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    28
    Tokens
    0

    Default

    that might be the case but the 58 and the 57 have a different pick up pattern, they have a different frequency response

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Cambridge, UK
    Posts
    901
    Tokens
    100

    Default

    That's strange considering they're both cardioid!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=33QPLbQi9FI

    Another reason I love the 58. My stock has survived numerous drops, I even dropped one from a catwalk just because I could and it stood up to it fine. Amazing microphones.
    we're smiling but we're close to tears, even after all these years

  4. #34
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    28
    Tokens
    0

    Default

    Correct but anyone knows that you get a different frequency response as they have different heads.
    Plus it clearly states it on their site.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Cambridge, UK
    Posts
    901
    Tokens
    100

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by turtle. View Post
    Correct but anyone knows that you get a different frequency response as they have different heads.
    Plus it clearly states it on their site.
    Hence why I prefer the 58. From testing on a snare for the lack of a better mic, a headless 58 sounds the same as a 57 to me.

    Anyway, edit to this, this is going wildly offtopic. What I'm saying is that for the same money, the quality from a 58 would be vastly superior to a crappy large diaphragm condenser microphone. If the budget was much higher, yeah, I would spec something different, but sub-£100 there's no other choice but a 58 tbh.
    Last edited by MattFr; 29-05-2010 at 09:36 PM.
    we're smiling but we're close to tears, even after all these years

  6. #36
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    28
    Tokens
    0

    Default

    or a thomann t.bone

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Cambridge, UK
    Posts
    901
    Tokens
    100

    Default

    Most likely not. I bet it sounds nasty.
    we're smiling but we're close to tears, even after all these years

  8. #38
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    28
    Tokens
    0

    Default

    Have a look on their website. Their demo's speak for the quality

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Cambridge, UK
    Posts
    901
    Tokens
    100

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by turtle. View Post
    Have a look on their website. Their demo's speak for the quality
    I feel they sound pretty harsh. Nothing to the smooth, rich sound of a 58.
    we're smiling but we're close to tears, even after all these years

  10. #40
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    28
    Tokens
    0

    Default

    I think it really depends what your doing with the mic Matt.

Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •