Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 49
  1. #31
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    California
    Posts
    8,725
    Tokens
    3,989
    Habbo
    HotelUser

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jewish Bear View Post
    Here's a list:
    1. drivers for anything recent
    2. graphics drivers that actually work as intended
    3. unity in the community (1000 forks? no thanks.)
    4. no true industry standard applications for nigh on everything
    5. pulse audio (NO)
    6. themes are all ugly or copying another os
    7. font rendering is absolutely terrible, no matter what setting you use
    8. no decent media player
    9. cmd line needed for normal day to day operation in most cases (avg. user should NEVER see a cmd line)
    10. horrible ui design
    11. go to a linux forum, ask a question, get no answer that solves the problem
    12. graphics drivers
    13. graphics drivers
    14. graphics drivers
    15. graphics drivers
    16. graphics drivers
    17. graphics drivers
    18. graphics drivers
    19. graphics drivers
    20. graphics drivers
    - Linux should not be used to play any games
    - There's a lot of applications for Linux, considering how few people who use it?
    - Themes ugly? It's sure as heck more customizable than its windows counterparts
    - A good media player is Banshee.
    - I completely disagree about font rendering being terrible. Infact I prefer it to Windows font rendering.
    - You're right about having to use the terminal too often, though if you're not an average user this is hardly big deal.
    - You simply cannot say it's a bad UI design, because there are many distributions of linux and many windows managers which offer many different UIs.
    - Support for Linux does suck, but as average users shouldn't use Linux anyway!

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    888
    Tokens
    177

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HotelUser View Post
    - Support for Linux does suck, but as average users shouldn't use Linux anyway!
    thats why many people dont use it

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    California
    Posts
    8,725
    Tokens
    3,989
    Habbo
    HotelUser

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Blinger View Post
    thats why many people dont use it
    And in the 8 last words of my post which you quoted I said the average user should not use it.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    888
    Tokens
    177

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HotelUser View Post
    And in the 8 last words of my post which you quoted I said the average user should not use it.
    yes and that is why many people don't use it, we aren't all technologically advanced

    (hows that for a big word (H))

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Breaking into your house
    Posts
    1,377
    Tokens
    50

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    I'd slightly disagree on the Graphics Drivers issue. I found fully working drivers for my ATI HD 4670 on Ubuntu.
    AMD Phenom X4 955 BE - 8GB RAM - Asus M5A97 - MSI HD6870 HAWK - Windows 8.1 Pro 64 - Samsung 840 Pro 256GB
    -----------------------------------------------------------


  6. #36
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    2,956
    Tokens
    7,870

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    If Linux wants to take over from Windows they obviously need to make it more user friendly.

    I've never used Linux but apparently the people who use it prefer the non user friendly element of it. Which shows Linux is meant for more advanced users, not your average users and for this reason it will probably never take over Windows.

    Apparently its great for servers though, most hosting sites over Linux servers over Windows. Crap for gaming though, just like Macs really, although as mentioned, with Steam now offering Mac games this could change.

    For the people who use Linux? Why do you use it? Is it due to the fact it isn't as user friendly as Windows? I ask this because most people in this post seem to want to make it more user friendly. Would this cause problems for its users?

  7. #37
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    /etc/passwd
    Posts
    19,110
    Tokens
    1,139

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by peteyt View Post
    If Linux wants to take over from Windows they obviously need to make it more user friendly.

    I've never used Linux but apparently the people who use it prefer the non user friendly element of it. Which shows Linux is meant for more advanced users, not your average users and for this reason it will probably never take over Windows.

    Apparently its great for servers though, most hosting sites over Linux servers over Windows. Crap for gaming though, just like Macs really, although as mentioned, with Steam now offering Mac games this could change.

    For the people who use Linux? Why do you use it? Is it due to the fact it isn't as user friendly as Windows? I ask this because most people in this post seem to want to make it more user friendly. Would this cause problems for its users?
    Macs don't perform anywhere near as well as Windows does playing the same games on the same hardware, it won't take off IMO.

    Also I dual boot Ubuntu Linux on my netbook with Windows 7, there are just some things it's good to use for, I like it to learn from, experiment with and for other things that are a bit harder to do than on Windows (i.e. aircrack-ng)
    Quote Originally Posted by Chippiewill View Post
    e-rebel forum moderator
    :8

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Peterborough, UK
    Posts
    3,855
    Tokens
    216

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HotelUser View Post
    - Linux should not be used to play any games
    Why not?

    Quote Originally Posted by HotelUser View Post
    - There's a lot of applications for Linux, considering how few people who use it?
    Few if any industry standard applications.

    Quote Originally Posted by HotelUser View Post
    - Themes ugly? It's sure as heck more customizable than its windows counterparts
    Doesn't mean it's not ugly, I have never found a theme that isn't ugly.

    Quote Originally Posted by HotelUser View Post
    - A good media player is Banshee.
    Banshee sucks hard. Terrible UI, even though it is my media player of choice when I'm on LUNACKS UNBTONOM.

    Quote Originally Posted by HotelUser View Post
    - I completely disagree about font rendering being terrible. Infact I prefer it to Windows font rendering.
    Windows ClearType is the DE-FACTO best font rendering in existence. 12 years of development makes sure of that.

    Quote Originally Posted by HotelUser View Post
    - You simply cannot say it's a bad UI design, because there are many distributions of linux and many windows managers which offer many different UIs.
    And all of them suck. Seriously, name one that doesn't (KDE and Gnome excluded, they already suck so hard it's unreal)
    awesome and *box are all stupid too.


    visit my internet web site on the internet
    http://dong.engineer/
    it is just videos by bill wurtz videos you have been warned

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Nottingham
    Posts
    7,752
    Tokens
    756
    Habbo
    katie.pricejorda

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Some of you are just outlining how Linux is just as good as Windows or nearly as good as Windows.

    Why would I use an OS which is just as good as Windows? I'm only going to use it if it's better than Windows and so far I'm yet to see any area where it's better than Windows (or even just as good).

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    California
    Posts
    8,725
    Tokens
    3,989
    Habbo
    HotelUser

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jewish Bear View Post
    Why not?
    You asked why not and below said there's few industry standard applications. It looks like you answered your own question!
    Quote Originally Posted by Jewish Bear View Post

    Few if any industry standard applications.
    Meh. This isn't as much of a problem as it used to be, because of how computing has moved to the internet!
    Quote Originally Posted by Jewish Bear View Post

    Doesn't mean it's not ugly, I have never found a theme that isn't ugly.
    Then you haven't looked at all the themes?
    Quote Originally Posted by Jewish Bear View Post

    Banshee sucks hard. Terrible UI, even though it is my media player of choice when I'm on LUNACKS UNBTONOM.
    I could have said anything and you would have insulted it.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jewish Bear View Post

    Windows ClearType is the DE-FACTO best font rendering in existence. 12 years of development makes sure of that.
    I disagree.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jewish Bear View Post

    And all of them suck. Seriously, name one that doesn't (KDE and Gnome excluded, they already suck so hard it's unreal)
    awesome and *box are all stupid too.
    KDE is ehhh. I'm going to glaring at you with narrow eyes followed by a mild-toned sarcastic laugh for saying Gnome sucks, because it quite obviously doesn't.

Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •