Discover Habbo's history
Treat yourself with a Secret Santa gift.... of a random Wiki page for you to start exploring Habbo's history!
Happy holidays!
Celebrate with us at Habbox on the hotel, on our Forum and right here!
Join Habbox!
One of us! One of us! Click here to see the roles you could take as part of the Habbox community!


Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 65
  1. #31
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Gloucester
    Posts
    1,801
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    do you have 6 fingers and webbed feet?

    any type of incest is wrong, any blood relations to any1 is absolutely minging and even if they were married into your family and they are still "classed" as relatives like your auntie who aint blood to you but married ur uncle. thats just wrong aswell.

    This thread is ridiculous why the hell would you legalise sleeping with your family? thats pretty much saying you cant get any sex outside your family its just pure skank

    Quote Originally Posted by Special View Post
    close relatives absolute no, auntie/uncle 90/10 wrong, cousins.. 60/40 wrong large distance relatives, 80/20 yes

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Leeds
    Posts
    4,896
    Tokens
    2,337

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stryderman View Post
    do you have 6 fingers and webbed feet?

    any type of incest is wrong, any blood relations to any1 is absolutely minging and even if they were married into your family and they are still "classed" as relatives like your auntie who aint blood to you but married ur uncle. thats just wrong aswell.

    This thread is ridiculous why the hell would you legalise sleeping with your family? thats pretty much saying you cant get any sex outside your family its just pure skank
    why did you quote my post for no apparent reason?

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Gloucester
    Posts
    1,801
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    cos of wht u said....

    ur saying its alright to get with distant relatives..

    which is why i said

    DO U HAVE 6 FINGERS AND WEBBED FEET?

    and carried on...


    PROBLEM?

    Quote Originally Posted by Special View Post
    why did you quote my post for no apparent reason?

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Leeds
    Posts
    4,896
    Tokens
    2,337

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stryderman View Post
    cos of wht u said....

    ur saying its alright to get with distant relatives..

    which is why i said

    DO U HAVE 6 FINGERS AND WEBBED FEET?

    and carried on...


    PROBLEM?
    normally people put the quote before they explain/add to it but whatever

    i've now edited it

    also, i didn't say my mother & father were close relatives, so no, i don't have 6 fingers & webbed feet
    Last edited by Special; 12-07-2010 at 04:35 PM.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    York/Manchester
    Posts
    2,525
    Tokens
    468

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stryderman View Post
    cos of wht u said....

    ur saying its alright to get with distant relatives..

    which is why i said

    DO U HAVE 6 FINGERS AND WEBBED FEET?

    and carried on...


    PROBLEM?
    You know, if you go back millions of years it would be possible for EVERYONE to be related... :/
    Or atleast most lolol.


  6. #36
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Gloucester
    Posts
    1,801
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    yeh..
    but then u can argue tht wht u jus said is complete ** depending on whether your religious or not.

    and thts millionsssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssss of years ago

    Quote Originally Posted by Muct View Post
    You know, if you go back millions of years it would be possible for EVERYONE to be related... :/
    Or atleast most lolol.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Leeds
    Posts
    4,896
    Tokens
    2,337

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stryderman View Post
    yeh..
    but then u can argue tht wht u jus said is complete ** depending on whether your religious or not.

    and thts millionsssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssss of years ago
    so what if it was millions of years ago lol i don't think much has changed in terms of human genes

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Gloucester
    Posts
    1,801
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Special View Post
    so what if it was millions of years ago lol i don't think much has changed in terms of human genes

    cos i doubt many people can trace their family back a couple of hundred years let alone millions of years ago..

    AN ANYWAY this is family now not millions of years ago CHRISTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    London
    Posts
    2,335
    Tokens
    50

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by buttons View Post
    hey our genes are very very similar to apes and mice but i'm not going to go **** one, if a guy was to do that would you still being saying "it is none of your business nor that of the state what people do in their bedrooms"?. why's it wrong?

    it's the same debate, you can call my point invalid but ask yourself why bestiality is wrong. how many people would willingly say it's fine? the only answer you'll hear is "it's disgusting, it's wrong, it's rape". it's the same with the view of incest. you can argue that incest may be consented and should be right if they both agree to it but that's not always the case. most of those sibling and even parent/child couples you hear of have been separated at an early age and once they're back together they feel a stronger bond. in my view, they're just confused and it's not healthy at all.
    sure, it was once seen as okay years ago yes but so was slavery. okay that was the best i could think of damn:@

    and actually no-one has the same genes. guys and girls have at least 80 different ones and the ones they share are different alleles serving different purposes.
    i thought we were meant to be unconsciously attracted to people with different genes to ensure a balance and therefore healthier offspring so it's not "low-risk" health risks at all lol, that incest german couple (the ones who met after years apart - refer to what i said about that), 2 out of 4 of their kids are disabled

    i would love to find a guy who treats me like my eldest brother does - not incest - just the same as a lot of hetrosexual guys look for girls like their mothers but the thought of a sexual relationship with him repulses me.

    i'm just really against it for some reason, maybe it's in my genes i respect that times are changing and there are good arguments for why it's not all that bad but i personally find it revolting. sorry...
    Someones listened in Biology! I agree with buttons, I find it disgusting its just not right. Even cousin to cousin I find wrong, don't ask me why because I can't explain why... It also exposes dysfunctional genes which would cause an outburst of some genetic disorders.

  10. #40
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    /etc/passwd
    Posts
    19,110
    Tokens
    1,139

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    I don't see what's wrong with it if it's distant relations, close ones like brothers and sisters can cause genetic problems though... a bit manky too
    Quote Originally Posted by Chippiewill View Post
    e-rebel forum moderator
    :8

Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •