Discover Habbo's history
Treat yourself with a Secret Santa gift.... of a random Wiki page for you to start exploring Habbo's history!
Happy holidays!
Celebrate with us at Habbox on the hotel, on our Forum and right here!
Join Habbox!
One of us! One of us! Click here to see the roles you could take as part of the Habbox community!


Page 4 of 12 FirstFirst 12345678 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 112
  1. #31
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Nottingham
    Posts
    7,752
    Tokens
    756
    Habbo
    katie.pricejorda

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Whilst I agree "Conservative" has made some rather outlandish and general remarks he isn't totally wrong, dogs aren't totally innocent. Lions and Snakes are "born good" but it doesn't mean that anyone should own one. It's in the nature of certain animals (including some breeds of dogs) to kill things and be very aggressive, in some cases they're virtually impossible to tame.

    Thus the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991, certain breeds are illegal in the UK so it's not ridiculous at all;
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dangerous_Dogs_Act_1991
    http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/HomeAndC...Pets/DG_180098

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    6,444
    Tokens
    6,671

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Wow anyone who thinks "Good" even a little bit is an idiot. *REMOVED*

    moderator alert Edited by HotelUser (Forum Super Moderator): Please don't be rude to other users.
    Last edited by HotelUser; 25-01-2011 at 11:48 PM.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    London
    Posts
    4,611
    Tokens
    0
    Habbo
    Conservative,

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jordy View Post
    Whilst I agree "Conservative" has made some rather outlandish and general remarks he isn't totally wrong, dogs aren't totally innocent. Lions and Snakes are "born good" but it doesn't mean that anyone should own one. It's in the nature of certain animals (including some breeds of dogs) to kill things and be very aggressive, in some cases they're virtually impossible to tame.

    Thus the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991, certain breeds are illegal in the UK so it's not ridiculous at all;
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dangerous_Dogs_Act_1991
    http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/HomeAndC...Pets/DG_180098
    Yeah some of my remarks, looking back, we're a bit outlandish and I do actually go against my self in a few ways, you pretty much put my view across

    DJ Robbie
    Former Jobs: Events Organiser, News Reporter, HxHD



  4. #34
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    York/Manchester
    Posts
    2,525
    Tokens
    468

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Conservative View Post
    Yeah some of my remarks, looking back, we're a bit outlandish and I do actually go against my self in a few ways, you pretty much put my view across
    So what are you actually trying to suggest to solve this MASSSSSSIVE problem we apparently have with certain breeds of dogs?

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    London
    Posts
    4,611
    Tokens
    0
    Habbo
    Conservative,

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Muct View Post
    So what are you actually trying to suggest to solve this MASSSSSSIVE problem we apparently have with certain breeds of dogs?
    I don't know...can't really explain it...I'm no vet, nor dog owner, but probably regular check-ups on the dogs behaviour and to see if the owner is treating it properly - if it is thought to be a danger to the public, the owners or itself it should be taken away.

    DJ Robbie
    Former Jobs: Events Organiser, News Reporter, HxHD



  6. #36
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    York/Manchester
    Posts
    2,525
    Tokens
    468

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Conservative View Post
    I don't know...can't really explain it...I'm no vet, nor dog owner, but probably regular check-ups on the dogs behaviour and to see if the owner is treating it properly - if it is thought to be a danger to the public, the owners or itself it should be taken away.
    What exactly do you mean by taken away?
    I can understand taking the dog away to be taught how to behave better - it's not exactly the dogs fault the owner treated it badly - such as beating it or something?

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    London
    Posts
    4,611
    Tokens
    0
    Habbo
    Conservative,

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Muct View Post
    What exactly do you mean by taken away?
    I can understand taking the dog away to be taught how to behave better - it's not exactly the dogs fault the owner treated it badly - such as beating it or something?
    Taken away, maybe trained, but if it's clearly not fit for being a pet - possibly destroyed (although that's last resort), or put to better use like guide-dogs? Who knows...

    DJ Robbie
    Former Jobs: Events Organiser, News Reporter, HxHD



  8. #38
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    York/Manchester
    Posts
    2,525
    Tokens
    468

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Conservative View Post
    Taken away, maybe trained, but if it's clearly not fit for being a pet - possibly destroyed (although that's last resort), or put to better use like guide-dogs? Who knows...
    I don't see how putting a vicous, dangerous dog on a leesh for a blind person will help, probably isn't that usually the disciplined, trained dogs?
    But meh, I guess I'll have to agree that last resort would have to be putting it down... D:

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Nottingham
    Posts
    7,752
    Tokens
    756
    Habbo
    katie.pricejorda

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Muct I don't see what you're arguing about? Certain breeds are illegal and if a dog of any breed attacks a human, it'll most likely be put down (and the owner also charged with an inability to look after the dog). It might not be the dogs fault that it's been brought up in such a way but once it's been shown to attack people it's too late to "re-train" it and should rightly be put down. Not that this has anything to do with the topic on hand anymore.

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    13,276
    Tokens
    1,243

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Conservative View Post
    Which is my point. I've never seen on the news "Boy mauled by poodle!" "Girl, 5, attacked by Chihuahua" it's the same 2 or 3 breeds (in various combinations) again and again. As I said - I'm not a dog hater - burn all dogs or w/e, but I just don't think that these types of dogs should be legal (and some aren't in the UK) because of the potential threat they pose to the public - and from personal experience I know what it feels like to be on the receiving end of a dog attack.
    so because the man in the shiny suit on BBC news reported that there was a pitbull (one of out thousands or more pitbulls in the country) incident means all of them are savage creatures?

Page 4 of 12 FirstFirst 12345678 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •