Discover Habbo's history
Treat yourself with a Secret Santa gift.... of a random Wiki page for you to start exploring Habbo's history!
Happy holidays!
Celebrate with us at Habbox on the hotel, on our Forum and right here!
Join Habbox!
One of us! One of us! Click here to see the roles you could take as part of the Habbox community!


Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 31 to 40 of 40
  1. #31
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    6,366
    Tokens
    325

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Cameron and Clegg need to sort out social imbalances in education before it gets to the stage where people apply for university.

    At university I find that people from private and state schools have different skills.

    And I also think that private schools for 6th forms are a waste of time in terms of grades and working, it's about the person at that point.
    goodbye.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    24,817
    Tokens
    63,679
    Habbo
    FlyingJesus

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NaughtyNemo View Post
    What, that makes perfect sense to me? Why give others a disadvantage just because they cant afford it. And if you're being charged the full whack then obviously your income can support that?
    Why give you an advantage over others just because your parents don't earn as much? There is next to no financial incentive to do well these days because if you're at the lowest level with a rubbish job you just get everything free anyway

    On the main point, the report said that Oxford or Cambridge (can't remember which) had only admitted 1 black person last year and that's where it stemmed from, but that's actually not the case at all - only 1 on census stated themselves as being of black Caribbean descent, but there were a number of students who identified themselves as black African, black British and so forth. Giving a tangible advantage to students simply BECAUSE they're poor/black/disabled/etc is far worse than not allowing them in due to their exam results as it displaces a potential student who has actually got the grades and worked to be there
    | TWITTER |



    Blessed be
    + * + * + * +

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    417
    Tokens
    80
    Habbo
    sophiethenerd

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    I am disabled (slightly) and If I was just let in because of that I would feel that was wrong. When people say not letting a person of a different race in university is racist (even if they were not let in due to grades) then the people are being racist as race has nothing to do with university places.
    Hi

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    3,641
    Tokens
    4,896
    Habbo
    Mark

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Imo, leave the guys alone and let them do their job, they can't make everyone happy but we've got another few years with them in party so just accept it lol.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    16,195
    Tokens
    3,454

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by markypee4 View Post
    Imo, leave the guys alone and let them do their job, they can't make everyone happy but we've got another few years with them in party so just accept it lol.
    Not if the coalition ends.

    They are targeting Oxbridge to cover their mistakes.

    They are manipulating data, then ************ about it.


  6. #36
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Hull
    Posts
    7,701
    Tokens
    2,430
    Habbo
    Moh

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Seams that they're trying to get on the good side of students.

    Doing this will only cause the university's to accept poor people over than people who have the grades just to please the government. I still don't see what the fuss is about the tuition fees. £9,000 a year for two of the best university's in the world is a bargain. For that standard in any other country would cost at least double that amount. They don't charge that amount just so poor students can't get in, they charge that because they need to. Some of the professors at Cambridge are on around £60k+ a year, they still need paying.

    If I was poor and had the grades to get in, why should I have any priority to people who have the money and the same grades? That's just hypercritical.

    When you apply, you don't even give them your financial details?

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    16,195
    Tokens
    3,454

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Moh View Post
    Seams that they're trying to get on the good side of students.

    Doing this will only cause the university's to accept poor people over than people who have the grades just to please the government. I still don't see what the fuss is about the tuition fees. £9,000 a year for two of the best university's in the world is a bargain. For that standard in any other country would cost at least double that amount. They don't charge that amount just so poor students can't get in, they charge that because they need to. Some of the professors at Cambridge are on around £60k+ a year, they still need paying.

    If I was poor and had the grades to get in, why should I have any priority to people who have the money and the same grades? That's just hypercritical.

    When you apply, you don't even give them your financial details?
    9k for virtually every other uni in the UK on the other hand, isn't.


  8. #38
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Hull
    Posts
    7,701
    Tokens
    2,430
    Habbo
    Moh

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Milestone View Post
    9k for virtually every other uni in the UK on the other hand, isn't.
    When the cap was £6k, not many unis actually changed that. Same with the cap of £9k.

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    4,614
    Tokens
    90

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Moh View Post
    When you apply, you don't even give them your financial details?
    They base it off your school and college and where you live to a certain extent.

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    6,366
    Tokens
    325

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Moh View Post
    When the cap was £6k, not many unis actually changed that. Same with the cap of £9k.
    the cap has never been £6k, it was ~£3.5k and a few years before that £1k.
    goodbye.

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •