This is something I'm quite curious about too. When I did work experience at two different newspapers earlier in the year, I was pretty much told that they have to be brutally careful about the stuff they publish. Obviously things such as court cases must be closely monitored as it may interfere with the jury's decision, but I do wonder where the line is actually drawn. They told me that they need to get consent for whatever is published: they don't say names unless the nod is given and they don't go publishing just "stuff they hear on the streets or in the back room of the court house".
Strangely enough though, this was a lot different to the type of stuff you read in the national tabloids. When NOTW was involved in the phone hacking, no consent was given by the individuals concerned... so how could they publish it?
Anyone know?![]()







Reply With Quote













