The screen is a big leap imo, and was one of the only reasons I would never buy one. Now it has a viable resolution it is a product to consider.

I find the name a bit odd. Why call it the "New iPad" when there are far better names for it?![]()
Former General Manager
Former Forum Manager
Former Site Manager
I've left, but I still visit sometimes!
Just got an email about the new iPad from apple. I'm not really a fan of Ipad's myself due to the fact it's too big I'd rather have a smart phone for general on the go, a laptop for travelling and a pc at home.
My main problem with the iPad is aren't a load of phone manufactures rumoured to be making quad core smart phones that may hit the market soon? I'm no expert in the field but if this is true I'd of thought the iPad would have had it, I mean if a small phone can do it then a large tablet can
"Words are pin sharp"
Not with Apple's AA they're not.
Chippiewill.
I've heard many people saying the battery life of an iPad was pretty decent already. But the battery itself has increased although does have the same amount of hours as the previous one.
Hence the "No real improvement" comment. I'm getting increasingly tired of yourself and others within this section needlessly correcting very small details or rephrasing what I'm saying.
Happens on all technology forums. But I only replied back to see if you had anything more to say on the matter as I personally didn't think it needed an improvement.
Well no, it's quite a big improvement to the battery life when you take into account it has LTE and that "Retina" display which will both suck on that battery like the world's ending.
Exactly. There is "no real improvement" in battery life as it is the same 10 hours. I just outlined how I'm sick of the pedancy so I don't appreciate yet another condescending post from yourself when nothing I've said is factually incorrect.
Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!