Apple forced to publish that Samsung didn't copy them!

[HotelUser]

And to end this discussion - it is you who over-reacts in all these threads. Look back over my post, I made no hint that Apple is in any way the only company that does this (I reiterate the fact you didn't read the post and just made the usual defensive attack).

Seriously, you should stop over-reacting and perhaps consider the importance of reading rather than making baseless assumptions :rolleyes:

The very first thing either of us said in this thread was you saying, "Good, it's about time Apple were told who's boss". If you said something negative about the patent system (because that's actually the problem, not Apple), then I would have agreed with what you said. Since you choose to spew out the usual anti-Apple crap, I felt more obligated to point out 20 times to you that all companies in this industry abuse the system and that you're silly to let your personal hatred towards Apple allow you to just continue to target Apple and ignore the heart of the problem (which to point out again is actually the system itself, not the company which you worry about blowing up the world (Apple)).

[GommeInc]

The very first thing either of us said in this thread was you saying, "Good, it's about time Apple were told who's boss". If you said something negative about the patent system (because that's actually the problem, not Apple), then I would have agreed with what you said. Since you choose to spew out the usual anti-Apple crap, I felt more obligated to point out 20 times to you that all companies in this industry abuse the system and that you're silly to let your personal hatred towards Apple allow you to just continue to target Apple and ignore the heart of the problem (which to point out again is actually the system itself, not the company which you worry about blowing up the world (Apple)).

And your love of assumptions led you to look incredibly silly infront of everyone. This is a thread about Apple, hence the immediate comment about Apple. The patent system is problematic, I didn't say it wasn't (but your failure to read and indeed cast wild assumptions made you think I did).

The rest of your post was your usual bile and silly comments which are as good as ignored.

[HotelUser]

And your love of assumptions led you to look incredibly silly infront of everyone. This is a thread about Apple, hence the immediate comment about Apple. The patent system is problematic, I didn't say it wasn't (but your failure to read and indeed cast wild assumptions made you think I did).

The rest of your post was your usual bile and silly comments which are as good as ignored.

I shall choose to ignore all else you've said and focus on only this.

[GommeInc]

I shall choose to ignore all else you've said and focus on only this.

Well I shall give you partial credit for reading for once, though as per usual you miss out the important part: "I didn't say it wasn't."

[HotelUser]

you miss out the important part: "I didn't say it wasn't."

My entire problem with you is your failure to explicitly agree with me that Apple is only a guilty as everybody else.

"Learn to read" *insert dramatic eye roll emote here*

[mrwoooooooo]

who the hell cares about hardware designs anyway

its the software that makes them different.

[GommeInc]

My entire problem with you is your failure to explicitly agree with me that Apple is only a guilty as everybody else.

"Learn to read" *insert dramatic eye roll emote here*

I do agree :S Did you not read my "the whole patent system is problematic" comment, or is your failure to read again becoming yet an ongoing problem with you?

[HotelUser]

I do agree :S Did you not read my "the whole patent system is problematic" comment, or is your failure to read again becoming yet an ongoing problem with you?

Hi Gomme "learn to read" Gomme:

My entire problem with you is your failure to explicitly agree with me that Apple is only a guilty as everybody else.

Instead of not contributing anything to our discussion other than baselessly insulting my intelligence because you don't know anything else to say (all Apple bashed out I suppose), why not make me happy and tell me Apple isn't evil and isn't the biggest hands down abuser of the market (I can only ask like a billion times, maybe one of these times "your failure to read" won't continue to be an ongoing problem). What's wrong, "the whole patent system is problematic" is the tiny scapegoat sentence you'll cling to here so you don't have to explicitly come out and put Apple's patent evilness rating in the same basket as everyone else's?

[Flisker]

I think we have all established now that the patent system is corrupt in most countries and companies of any size abuse it to get back at their rivals whether it's a personal vendetta or not.

I know you two are attempting at a civil -somewhat heated - discussion but you are getting to the point where you're about to do something stupid.

[GommeInc]

Hi Gomme "learn to read" Gomme:

And I answered it with "I do agree", not that I needed to as I clearly didn't say Apple was the only offender to begin with. Is this really what this discussion has turned into? Pointing out your failure to read posts and make assumptions?

Instead of not contributing anything to our discussion other than baselessly insulting my intelligence because you don't know anything else to say (all Apple bashed out I suppose), why not make me happy and tell me Apple isn't evil and isn't the biggest hands down abuser of the market (I can only ask like a billion times, maybe one of these times "your failure to read" won't continue to be an ongoing problem). What's wrong, "the whole patent system is problematic" is the tiny scapegoat sentence you'll cling to here so you don't have to explicitly come out and put Apple's patent evilness rating in the same basket as everyone else's?

Oh do shh, I have been, it is your inability to read my posts which is the problem here. I have made meaningful posts, but it is your lack of meaningful points which is the problem, because you completely ignore my posts to get over some point no-one needs to care about.

Besides, I can't insult intelligence when there doesn't appear to be any to insult

Read my posts over and over again until it sinks in. The post you even quoted says: "I do agree." It was your failure to read any of my posts to begin with that has caused this pointless discussion, because you assume that because I did not explicitly say Apple isn't the only company to leech off the patent system, that must instantly mean that I think it is - yet this was your crazy assumpton because you've deluded yourself with the "I am the Apple Protector" title which has clouded your vision (and your ability to read posts) and has made you make information off the top of your head, like you do in any tech topic - previous threads are evidence of your deluded nature and lack of understanding. Either that, or because you completely mucked up your first posts (which were immediately shot down as rubbish) that this is the only point you have left, which is equally bizarre.

http://www.habboxforum.com/showthrea...55#post7534055
http://www.habboxforum.com/showthrea...74#post7534074
http://www.habboxforum.com/showthrea...85#post7425785

How can you not comprehend that?! Seriously David, I don't get what your problem is! You've completely destroyed this topic because you feel the need to be the big Apple defender, insulting people by showing a lack of ability to read, making accusations from thin air and half of your posts literally start off with comments that are completely unrelated to the posts you've quoted - or you simply ignore the important parts of quotes (as you do with any reliable source too, the case for example) - it's like you completely ignore any posts people make just to get over some point that you love Apple and feel compelled to defend it even when it doesn't need it, and hide behind the "I don't only defend Apple" idea despite the fact this thread is testament to the fact you must clearly be an Apple fanboy because you ignore all the relevant information by purposely not reading posts just to get over some rather pathetic point across, which is in turn evidence that you purposely do not read posts - and the circle continues.