This forum is full of Stans

[Notorious]

Here is an edit for your original post to save confusion that you contradicted a first paragraph of sarcasm with the second:

"I saw this, wasn't sure it was directed to me because of how stupid it was, and then realized it was about me when you quoted it yourself and told me to respond. You wanted to feel special by me responding, and know you can know how it feels. Well, first off, I am fit. All girls will like me. I only want to get laid. I don't care about a girl's feelings. I would use them.

But on a serious tone, girls have told me I'm attractive although I personally do not agree with them. I doubt most preppy white girls think I'm good looking though. Not to be mean, but I'm not into serious relationships and that may sound like I'm such a stud that goes through a million relationships with the opposite *** including intercourse and I don't take them seriously, it just means nothing escalating above a friend. Take what I typed how you want. If someone's dense enough to believe in love, then of course someone's feeling will get hurt. Girls look at intercourse as emotional, but the truth is, it's all physical. Real talk."

There you have it.
Looks as if you need to spend a little time expanding on what you're saying so people can get the full idea. This is a forum on the internet, okay?
You can't really say I'm not bright when you're the one expecting everyone to get EVERYTHING you say on a forum without the use of body language or even just the tones in speech.
Emoticons help ;].

Hm? What are you trying to say? By the way, I said 'serious tip' not 'serious tone'. Are you E-stalking me? Here's an emoticon for you.

[MasterOfPuppets]

Hm? What are you trying to say? By the way, I said 'serious tip' not 'serious tone'. Are you E-stalking me? Here's an emoticon for you.

I was incorporating a part explaining your faults that stated tone which sounded like an improvement on "tip".

Hm? What am I trying to say. Not really going to go into an effort to explain anymore because the message was pretty blatant. :rolleyes:
Your "emoticon" was probably the most defeatist statement that could be issued.
Not only do I not care about someones middle fingers directed at me, but it's a last attempt to try and offend, which didn't work.
Also it could've been a slight mistake on your half.

[Spitz]

I notice that the only threads that has anything to do with Hip-Hop involves Eminem. (Threads Within The Last Month) Why? Don't you listen to rappers other than Eminem? There are tons of better rap artists. Expand your minds and stop watching MTV.

Yes, I'm aware this is yet another thread on the 'great white hope'.

i like
2-pac biggie suge knight dre.dre warren g snoop dogg nate dogg
p diddy ludacris 50 Cent ;'p

[Notorious]

I was incorporating a part explaining your faults that stated tone which sounded like an improvement on "tip".

Hm? What am I trying to say. Not really going to go into an effort to explain anymore because the message was pretty blatant. :rolleyes:
Your "emoticon" was probably the most defeatist statement that could be issued.
Not only do I not care about someones middle fingers directed at me, but it's a last attempt to try and offend, which didn't work.
Also it could've been a slight mistake on your half.

Now why would you edit my post? You can't explain yourself because you can't back up your statements. You asked for an emoticon and I got one. The 'rolling eyes' smiley can also be considered as defeatist. It only goes to show that you were bothered by my statement. Then again, it's just a virtual face. What difference does it make? You seem to get agitated very easily.

[kasi]

I notice that the only threads that has anything to do with Hip-Hop involves Eminem. (Threads Within The Last Month) Why? Don't you listen to rappers other than Eminem? There are tons of better rap artists. Expand your minds and stop watching MTV.

Yes, I'm aware this is yet another thread on the 'great white hope'.

not true cause half of them dont like eminem?

[Notorious]

not true cause half of them dont like eminem?

Search the past month's thread topics of music. Any thread having to do with Hip-Hop involoved Eminem, with the exception of one which was about 50 Cent, Em's label mate.

[kasi]

Search the past month's thread topics of music. Any thread having to do with Hip-Hop involoved Eminem, with the exception of one which was about 50 Cent, Em's label mate.

not all are about eminem and such... yeah most are but not all.

[MasterOfPuppets]

Now why would you edit my post? You can't explain yourself because you can't back up your statements. You asked for an emoticon and I got one. The 'rolling eyes' smiley can also be considered as defeatist. It only goes to show that you were bothered by my statement. Then again, it's just a virtual face. What difference does it make? You seem to get agitated very easily.

The middle finger itself is defeatist, not just an emoticon.
I do get agigtated very easily if someone like you thinks they're the be all, end all of what's right and what's wrong.
You firstly asked "Why did you edit my post?"
Well I don't need to explain myself further because you've defended yourself by explaining your post later on, which isn't a good idea because you know if you had expanded on it at the time what would happen? That's right I wouldn't have quoted you for saying the exact same thing twice and we wouldn't be here. So do everyone a favour by EXPLAINING YOURSELF, another example being the gimmick thread.
Basically in the end this is your fault for not explaining yourself, tough luck buddy you aren't so right about everything as you thought you were.

[Dupion]

I don't like eminem, and this forum aint full of emo's. It's just music, get over it.

[Notorious]

The middle finger itself is defeatist, not just an emoticon.
I do get agigtated very easily if someone like you thinks they're the be all, end all of what's right and what's wrong.
You firstly asked "Why did you edit my post?"
Well I don't need to explain myself further because you've defended yourself by explaining your post later on, which isn't a good idea because you know if you had expanded on it at the time what would happen? That's right I wouldn't have quoted you for saying the exact same thing twice and we wouldn't be here. So do everyone a favour by EXPLAINING YOURSELF, another example being the gimmick thread.
Basically in the end this is your fault for not explaining yourself, tough luck buddy you aren't so right about everything as you thought you were.

What difference does it make? It's a damn smiley. If you have to revert to use one to express yourself, without the typed words to speak for themself, then it's automatically not a strong post. I'm including my own, before you try to You catching feelings shows how weak you get over a forum. This is the Internet. You think I'm ****y, huh? At least I have self-esteem. Nothing wrong in that, is there?
So you don't feel like answering that question ("Why did you edit my post?"). What was your point in editing my post? You do need to explain that part. Did it add to anything? You're contradicting yourself, too. You say that I explained my post LATER ON but also want me to do everyone a favor by explaining myself NOW? Make sense. What I typed before wasn't even aimed at you.
At the end of the day, I'm right, as usual. I hope you're not the type of person that gets online in attempts to 'son' or 'own' random people. This is what happens when guys experience their own version of PMS. You seem fixated on every post I make. You have nothing else to say so you judge me for an emoticon? Pathetic. I made a comment that was true and it brought this thread way off-track.