• A proposal to replace the repuation system •

[—Benji]

Yeh, nice idea. But then the planks who bought rep would be left in the ....

A bit wouldnt they?

Maybe.. You could have this aswell as rep?

PS: Someone might have said it, I only read the 1st page of posts.

[Article.]

Excellent idea

[Sly]

It sounds very good. But it wouldnt replace the reputation system, it can be used in stead of usertitle. Like where we now have newbie / greater member / senior member and the usertitle pictures, we could do instead a system with stars. And maybe we can even make it so that higher posts ranks gives some extra privileges like editing own post, though i dont think that is possible to allow that for certain groups only.

I like my user title


Good idea though

[Ostinato]

I think it's a good idea, but doubt if it will happen! :]

[Biseinen]

I think it's a good idea, but doubt if it will happen! :]

Hehe, I can hope. :p

I think it would refresh the forum in a way.

[brodeo]

I don't know. I think you should gain stars the more meaningful your posts are - even though thats hardly a rateable system. It always seems like this though:

1-100 posts - Your posts are quite nooby
101-500 posts - Your posts are thought carefully
501-1000 posts - Your posts are on topic and you think before posting
1000+ - You post a lot and some are pointless
2000+ - Your posts normally consist of utter jibberish rubbish which nobody really cares about, you most probably use the word 'pls' excessively and you are reliable for most of the spam on this forum.

Not saying everyones like this, it's just a very usually correct stereotype i have. I think it's a good idea, but for some people with high post counts i wouldn't want to reward their *cough*meaningful*cough* posts at all.

[Sank]

I don't know. I think you should gain stars the more meaningful your posts are - even though thats hardly a rateable system. It always seems like this though:

1-100 posts - Your posts are quite nooby
101-500 posts - Your posts are thought carefully
501-1000 posts - Your posts are on topic and you think before posting
1000+ - You post a lot and some are pointless
2000+ - Your posts normally consist of utter jibberish rubbish which nobody really cares about, you most probably use the word 'pls' excessively and you are reliable for most of the spam on this forum.

Not saying everyones like this, it's just a very usually correct stereotype i have. I think it's a good idea, but for some people with high post counts i wouldn't want to reward their *cough*meaningful*cough* posts at all.

I don't agree with the 2000+.

People with 2000+ usually know how to type properly.

[brodeo]

I don't agree with the 2000+.

People with 2000+ usually know how to type properly.

I never said they had the inability to type. Just the inability to make a meaningful thread and/or post. Try the Discuss Anything forum - most of the posters have 2000+ post counts, and you will see my stereotype fits perfectly.

[holo-jonny]

Great Idea.Would encourage spam but it beats the crud out of rep anyday.

[darkchicken101]

So you're saying, that anyone would need 700 posts to change their avatar or sig?