I Think If SomeBody Murders Another Person
The Death penalty is good
Because You Killed soemone you should be killed in return for killing the other person

I Think If SomeBody Murders Another Person
The Death penalty is good
Because You Killed soemone you should be killed in return for killing the other person
So after the murders killed, the exuctioner (perosn who swiched the swich) must also be kiled by that logic, and that perosn in term must be killed, until everyoens dead. Wow you make a great contry leader <_<Originally Posted by -Matty-
I Think If SomeBody Murders Another Person
The Death penalty is good
Because You Killed soemone you should be killed in return for killing the other person
Would the same applay to soldures, police etc? by your logic it would
( well youd still be better than bush, but thats not saying much)
This is an interesting topic. I refuse to read all teh replies because taht would change my reply and I would feel unsure on whether I should even reply.
So anyway, the death penalty, Why not?!?! People kill hundreds, why can't they lose THEIRS? Plus, in prison you have the chance to escape! That causes major problems. Also there are jail overcrowdings! What is the purpose of living life in jail? Taking up more space and food? The only possible problem could be people abusing this rite and using the death penalty unfairly. Still I see no reason to ban it.
It costs nothing to be a good friend.
American and Proud
I also use the account nvrspk on other computers.
![]()
Yeah, Thats exactly what I think. A waste of space in jail. And its either the death penalty. Or that person will go and kill mroe people.
Supporting somthing is often consided as bad as doing it. So killing hundereds of killers, is alrigt? yet if a person killed anotehr murders they are still in the wrong. yet there allowed to do it if there exuters who get told when there allowed. There still murders in my opinon.
You say kill them as they jsut take up food and space? Why not go on a rampage and kill of oold people and disabled people? thats seems like a graet idea? <_<
If your religios and support teh death penlty, by the bibels own deffintion, you will be going to what ever hell you blive in.
Not really, its the law..
And old/disabled people are not a waste of space. They havent wronged anyone, so what would be the point of killing them?
Death penalty is wrong, no matter what sum1 did. its not nice at all
So, basically, if we had a modern day Hitler, it would be wrong to give him the death penalty?
Saddam Hussien is supposed to getting the death penalty I don't know whether he has or not?
Join My Forum
No deffuinty not. its a commonly belive that bacue of teh harsh versy treatsy and teh germansy state, after the war. (idots french brits etc are) The if hitler haddent started ww2 someone else would. if he had been removed would it have solved anything? Nope.Originally Posted by Corey777
So, basically, if we had a modern day Hitler, it would be wrong to give him the death penalty?
Hitler himslef athogh unaware is part jew, turned on the jews as it gave teh contry someone to blame for there troubles, wich was easyer, as the jewish had alot of the top jobs due to a good gentic jean pool, athogh there religos techisng are to teh exstant it was wrong for them to marry those who were not alos jewish, wich casued segttion wich was anotehr reason hitler targeted them.
Killintg hitler would mroe likly have casue teh outcome to be even worse, as it would have given them a marten and cause a posiblky even more exstarm ruler to take power isnted.
Killing doesnt solve anything. Even hitler could not kill without being ill (fact) if u codl kil hiom thats would make you WORSE than hitler. Keep that i mind
Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!