I believe something similar but he planned for the Big Bang to happen and what would come from it, following his plan.Originally Posted by Rups

I believe something similar but he planned for the Big Bang to happen and what would come from it, following his plan.Originally Posted by Rups
I believe god caused the big bang.
موٹا بيكار كائيّاں بدتميز چوپاگsaalis haeń faajirahz
benji- stop being childish
it's not funny
-back to topic-
I have really no idea..
if we say sub atomic particles what created them then... the problem for that would be: what created the sub atomic particles
maybe the world was never created..
it's always been there
that would solve everything
Last edited by Catchetat; 31-05-2006 at 05:23 PM.
Please visit my websites (yn)
http://ks3sci.webs.com/ to revise Key stage 3 Science
http://igcsechem.webs.com/ to revise I/GCSE Chemistry
http://plain_indians.webs.com to learn about the plain indians
http://medic4u.webs.com for first year medical notes
http://medics4u.webs.com for second year medical notes
http://catchetat.blogspot.co.uk/ to check out my blog (as a boring medical student)
Most things that come out of crackers are crap. But not you Helen. :]Originally Posted by -Benji
It came out a cracker.
Lolololol.Originally Posted by Glove.
Most things that come out of crackers are crap. But not you Helen. :]
Shush.
And it's a more believable theory than some, that people actually take seriously, so shush mr Catchetat.
I believe you. :]Originally Posted by -Benji
Lolololol.
Shush.
And it's a more believable theory than some, that people actually take seriously, so shush mr Catchetat.
Lmao, let's start a cult.Originally Posted by Glove.
I believe you. :]
The "I believe Helen came out of a cracker" cult? WOW. WE'RE COOLER THAN THE KKK.
My religion doesnt even have a creation story o.O
MERRY CHRISTMAS!
Maybe it was just.. there?
Actaly its pretty simple, althogh has nothing to do with evioltion, its simply a matter of probailty, when you have infinate time and infinite matter, its no suprise.Originally Posted by 8Freak8
I think trying to explain the beginning of the universe is pretty easy compared to the start of life. Anybody want to try lol? And I mean the START of life, not how life became diverse (evolution). It is completely different.
Abiogenesis pretty much accounts for it
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abiogenesis
deffinence between fundatonalists who will still clame the earth is fact and people that have working brain cells...I always thought that Christians believed Genesis was a symbolic representation of the beginning of the universe, I didn't realise they actually thought it took 6 days.
no one asked how the universe began? its easly accounable threw M-theary, but the question was earth. And thats creation is scinentific fact, Its a simple matter of gravity and cosimic dust "/ easy to simulateI don't believe it took 6 days, but I guess people might say that the first instance of time in the universe was triggered by God, and the rest since then is cause and affect.
Like I said, the beginning of life is more interesting.
Thats no better than saying god did it, first cause agrumenets are pretty floored in that way, ininate regress thogh isnt realy imposiable, and would pretty much fit in with the always been here ideas, althogh this is disprovable.Originally Posted by Catchetat
benji- stop being childish
it's not funny
-back to topic-
I have really no idea..
if we say sub atomic particles what created them then... the problem for that would be: what created the sub atomic particles
look at the stars at night, consider theres a more aless infitnate numbrer out there.
If the planet had always been here, every stars light would have reached us, the night sky would be compleaty and totaly lit up, as its not, we have to preosume they havent always been there "/
Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!