Iran VS Britain [Would you back the war?]

[alexxxxx]

Iran can't really destroy Britain from where they are atm. And we'd know about it. MI5 is on the case.

[2hd.]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_an...ss_destruction

[Luckyrare]

Yes I would and if I was the right age I would fight in it.

BTW, we dont know that they have them. They know we have them. Plus we have one of the best armed forces in the world. If they did kill the captures, I am pretty sure we would have pently on backup (Europe, US and possibly Russia). I wouldnt class Iraq as a war, more of a stabilization.

Regarding the 15 people they say where in their waters, Iran is pathetic. I think they where in Iraqi waters, if they where in Irans waters (they have no proof, our GPS systems showed them in Iraq waters).

[Browney]

If neccessary. But I don't see 15 soldiers as an issue. We can solve this by talking, not gunfire.

I would like to see a "civil war" from the eastern countries against the USA.

[Funky]

Britain lost many men in Iraq, now there just gonna loose more.
I dont support Iran, though there is no proof that they didint enter Iranian waters.

[Browney]

Britain lost many men in Iraq, now there just gonna loose more.
I dont support Iran, though there is no proof that they didint enter Iranian waters.

Having fun in that cave of yours? It's been all over the news that we have GPS and photos to prove we were in Iraq waters.

[Yum999]

What Iran is doing now is a publicity stunt, to try and scare the rest of the world. They know our sailors were in Iraqi waters.

America is looking for a reason to go to war with Iran, I wouldn't be surprised if it happens.

If it does, I will back it 100%. I think wars in Afghanistan and Iraq were unjustified, but if a country is defying United Nations orders (and it is part of the UN) then we have every right to use military action to keep them in check.

For further information on the sailor story, click the link.

https://habbox.com/site/content/view/2272/95/

It's the story I wrote on Habbox this morning.

[Eckuii]

Britain lost many men in Iraq, now there just gonna loose more.
I dont support Iran, though there is no proof that they didint enter Iranian waters.

Lol, where have you been?
Even on Prime Ministers question time the other day, Tony Blair said that Iran gave co-ordinates where the ships were, and then Britain confirmed that that was in fact Iraqi waters, and then Iran came back with a different set of co-ordinates with the ships in Iran waters, HELLO?

All this talk about Nuclear weapons and stuff, Iran probably dont know how to use them, and hopefully America or England could send in Special Forces to get rid of them, or track them down or something.

I hope we dont go to stablize Iran, because then we loose more men, which we dont want.

[Jazza]

If it became serious (like WWII serious) I would definately fight, I would certainly support a war which protects Great Britain from any foreign enemy. However unless it was a war in which bombs were dropping on both sides or they had weapons which could be used against us, I don't think I'd support it.

[RedStratocas]

No, because it can be solved without violence. The old Iranian hostage crisis was a different story because that was actual violence. This hostage crisis is pretty much just Iran crying out for attention. The only thing the hostages are suffering from is boredom. They'll let them go eventually, they're just being stubborn. No need for hundreds maybe thousands of people die for something you can just let go. And as for nuclear weapons, no nation smart enough to actual get nuclear weapons actually uses them, because the U.S. has enough to destroy the world 15 times over. Everyone's got the bomb. I've got the bomb. Keep it under my bed.

The point is that war should ALWAYS be last resort. Everything else must fail, or there must be no other safe options. In this case, there are clearly options.