where have i heard this from

[Ostinato]

You ignored all of what I said and decided not to argue about Global Warming, but chose to argue about me.

So i'd suggest you read over what I have said and if you don't agree with me, then you can challenge what I have said.

I think you'll actually find I did challenge you about the issue, which you ignored. I therefore challenged your presence within the thread as a whole as you did ignore my post in the first place - so I'd suggest you get your facts right before making your accusations pal.

[-:Undertaker:-]

How does global warming not exist?

Fair enough it is a natural occurrence and has happened before with regulations in the earth's temperature.

However, you can't say that humans haven't caused it at all, as it's clear with our increase of carbon emissions such as power plants and pollution etc. have definitely helped speed up and further this global warming.

That's it?

You haven't challenged anything I said, I can't actually reply to that as I have already said things which explain Global Warming.

I think you'll actually find I did challenge you about the issue, which you ignored. I therefore challenged your presence within the thread as a whole as you did ignore my post in the first place - so I'd suggest you get your facts right before making your accusations pal.

Look above.

i'm with undertaker, global warming doesn't exist.

my geography teacher convinced me.
the earth has been heating up and cooling down since it was created, just look at ice ages? they came and went, because the earth heated up and cooled by itself.
human's do not cause it, it's just that at the moment it's been a long time without a cooling down period, so people are worrying and looking for something to blame it on.
tis a load of toss.

Exactly, your Geography teacher had brains just like one of my Science Teachers

Ostinato, I find it strange how you target my posts which were more detailed than his/hers and yet you say 'I feel that the majority of your opinions regarding them come across pretty naive and narrow-minded.'

[Ostinato]

That's it?

You haven't challenged anything I said, I can't actually reply to that as I have already said things which explain Global Warming.



Look above.



Exactly, your Geography teacher had brains just like one of my Science Teachers

Ostinato, I find it strange how you target my posts which were more detailed than his/hers and yet you say 'I feel that the majority of your opinions regarding them come across pretty naive and narrow-minded.'

I've already indicated to you, when I said the majority of your opinions come across naive and narrow-minded I wasn't reffering to this thread but moreso a wider range of threads you have been posting in this week. I said to you, that I respect your opinion upon this matter and agree that it is a widely believed opinion.

I fail to see how you cannot respond to my challenge of the argument. You claim global warming isn't caused by humans at all and is solely nature. I then posted in response to that disagreeing saying that of course nature does have a role, but so do we as humans and we are responsible for helping speed it up.

You could have therefore responded to that indicating that you agree or disagree - therefore I fail to see how you can try to make out as though my post was unjustifiable.

[-:Undertaker:-]

I've already indicated to you, when I said the majority of your opinions come across naive and narrow-minded I wasn't reffering to this thread but moreso a wider range of threads you have been posting in this week. I said to you, that I respect your opinion upon this matter and agree that it is a widely believed opinion.

I fail to see how you cannot respond to my challenge of the argument. You claim global warming isn't caused by humans at all and is solely nature. I then posted in response to that disagreeing saying that of course nature does have a role, but so do we as humans and we are responsible for helping speed it up.

You could have therefore responded to that indicating that you agree or disagree - therefore I fail to see how you can try to make out as though my post was unjustifiable.

I have said that it's been happening for many years, therefore Humans don't contribute to it at all.

Let's say when the Earths first Warmign Period, it took 100 years? yeah, well all of them are not going to take 100 years are they, some will take thousands of years and some will be 60 years long, 30 years long, 2 million years long, Just because this one is 'considered' fast doesn't mean we speed it up.

Also to let you know, I missed your post but when I look at it, I have already covered these things before.

I dont' reply to every single post in this thread, only ones which I think are worth replying to.

Anyway, which of my posts are narrow minded from this week?

[Ostinato]

I have said that it's been happening for many years, therefore Humans don't contribute to it at all.

Let's say when the Earths first Warmign Period, it took 100 years? yeah, well all of them are not going to take 100 years are they, some will take thousands of years and some will be 60 years long, 30 years long, 2 million years long, Just because this one is 'considered' fast doesn't mean we speed it up.

Also to let you know, I missed your post but when I look at it, I have already covered these things before.

I dont' reply to every single post in this thread, only ones which I think are worth replying to.

Anyway, which of my posts are narrow minded from this week?

If you think I'm going to bring up every post you've made your mistaken, as to be honest I've a lot better things to be spending my time on and I'm about to go offline as I am waiting on my girlfriend coming here.

Anyway, like I said originally - you actually do not respond to peoples posts anyway, you just reinstate what you said in the first place - which is pretty pointless all round.

I'm sure a lot of people within this thread see what I'm saying anyway, lol, so it's done mate. :rolleyes:

[-:Undertaker:-]

If you think I'm going to bring up every post you've made your mistaken, as to be honest I've a lot better things to be spending my time on and I'm about to go offline as I am waiting on my girlfriend coming here.

Anyway, like I said originally - you actually do not respond to peoples posts anyway, you just reinstate what you said in the first place - which is pretty pointless all round.

I'm sure a lot of people within this thread see what I'm saying anyway, lol, so it's done mate. :rolleyes:

Fine. but next time you say something like that, please give examples

I do respond to peoples posts, but sometimes I prefer to not quote peoples posts and do a 'general reply' to everyone.

I only reinstate what I have said when people either quote me and say 'it does exist' which means they have completely ignored what I have stated.

It's called discussing mate, try and learn it one day.

[Ostinato]

Fine. but next time you say something like that, please give examples

I do respond to peoples posts, but sometimes I prefer to not quote peoples posts and do a 'general reply' to everyone.

I only reinstate what I have said when people either quote me and say 'it does exist' which means they have completely ignored what I have stated.

It's called discussing mate, try and learn it one day.

Pmsl, you make me laugh so much.

Discussing? No pal, I think you need to learn discussing. Discussing is when you actually consider other point's of view and peoples opinions. You simply have your own set point of view and simply reinstate it repeatedly. I also find, generally, a lot of your views on things are quite deluded and childish - for example in relation to the whole benoit thing, with you so definite that it was all fake and stuff although it was basically a proven fact it had happened.

Anyhoo, I have better things to do rather than waste more time on the likes of you.

[-:Undertaker:-]

Pmsl, you make me laugh so much.

Discussing? No pal, I think you need to learn discussing. Discussing is when you actually consider other point's of view and peoples opinions. You simply have your own set point of view and simply reinstate it repeatedly. I also find, generally, a lot of your views on things are quite deluded and childish - for example in relation to the whole benoit thing, with you so definite that it was all fake and stuff although it was basically a proven fact it had happened.

Anyhoo, I have better things to do rather than waste more time on the likes of you.

I have looked at both sides of the arguement..

But I just don't see an arguement to say Global Warming exists, also would you like me in one post to argue for, then in the next post argue against it?, i'd get flamed and i'd be posting things which I don't believe in.

I also find it strange how you didn't have a go at the other persion who said it was a load of bull, but they went into less detail about it.

Anyhoo, I find it strange how in every thread you seem determined to have a go at me then when it's time for you to go you say 'I don't want to waste time', why even awknowlege my posts if it's a waste of time?

So please do ignore me in future.

[OMGitsaROSS]

"Global Warming" is that natural occurance before an ice age imo.

[Ostinato]

So please do ignore me in future.

I find that quite difficult when your constantly posting crap.