People were saying the same thing about homosexuals not that long ago.Originally Posted by Sean
Results 41 to 50 of 67
-
-
22-01-2008, 07:23 PM #42
I feel this is a very difficult question to answer much I am reviled by some acts that human beings inflict upon each other I just do have the stomach for execution. I am strictly much against capital punishment although I do have sympathies with families deprived of their loved ones through murder.
Apart from the fact that the person convicted could be innocent they could also be suffering severe mental conditions and not be really in charge of their of their senses or actions.
Personally I would favour chemical castration for sexual crimes. I would also favour in the cases where the people could not live with their crimes - regulated self-euthanasia. If anybody saw that show on TV the other night they would see how extremely brutal all forms of execution can be and the only painless one seemed to be hypoxia caused by severe altitude sickness where it just seemed to make you drunk.
I know the bible says 'an eye for an eye' but I think in this day and age its not really justified. Incarsaration for life should be life though for anything other than unpremeditated murders with compulsory work til pension age.
Posts merged by REDNECK (forum moderator) due to lag causing a double-post
Last edited by jesus; 22-01-2008 at 07:29 PM.
-
Now, I've read the thread, and seen all this, an eye for an eye stuff.
But, we do have to take into the consideration, the concept, of you
becoming worse than the person convicted.
But, you can also take into account, the pain and suffering this particuluar
person has caused, the distress, and devastation that could've happened.
The British Governmental Justice System, is flawed in many ways, yes.
Execution is something that is very similar to acting as God.
Spare a life, Take a life.
If evidence is irresputabely definite, then the person shall be convicted,
but you also must take into the case of what the person done, how he done it, and put your self in the convicts shoes.
- Why Did He/She Do It?
- Does He/She have a medical record, for mental insubordnation?
- Does the convict, have a anger problem, or some form of psychiatric disease.
But, if this person has raped, and murdered people painfully, then yes,
an execution is a liable grant for such a heidious act. But, I dislike how that
when we think of execution, we think of how the movies, and such terrible ideas of how, and what will happen. Will it be entertaining?
The execution if one is declared, should be something very simple, but not in a manner of a grotesque death.
-
i think depending on how bad the crime commited is then they should be tortured and not killed. put them through as much suffering as possible. they shouldn't have murdered in the first place
Joined Habbox for the first time on the 29-10-2005 // Joined Habbox for the second time on the 08-10-2006 // Joined Habbox for the third time on the 30-09-2007 // Became a Habbox Writer on the 26-11-2007 // Became a Senior Habbox Writer on the 07-02-2008 // Left Habbox 01-07-2008 // Came back to habbox on 23-08-2008 // Became a Writer again on the 27-08-2008 // Became a Trialist Content Designer on the 22-09-08 // Left Habbox on the 30-09-08
-
off topic:
That green thing James, which you have in dp & sig,
the video on youtube is from my school
Edited by Agesilaus (Forum Super Moderator): Please do not post off topic.Last edited by Agesilaus; 22-01-2008 at 11:50 PM.
-
Well it's right if the person has done wrong and there's sufficent proof, which a lot of the time there isn't.
But I don't think they should be executed, two reaons. If the person is innocent he/she loses his/her life... which is a heafty price to pay for something you didn't do. If the person did do the crime, then it'd have to be really bad to be executed in the first place... so why give them an easy way out for commiting a terrible crime? Death is an exit.
So they should be locked away but not be treated as if they're in a hotel.
Please note these are my views, so don't start moaning at me.
-
Meh, i dont think anyone should be killed, if so, the whole army should be ;/.
meh, for one reason only and this reason, is, say you was forced to kill someone, but the law looks at it in a different way, for ect, you had to defend your wife, i sure you guys would, but the only way was killing them, and yes, i know you be saying, yeh but blah blah, but it not always like they, they make mistakes, and blame it on him fully ;/
-
why should the army be killed? :S Originally Posted by Warezkid2
sorry i didnt understand any of that post
-
Originally Posted by REDNECK
i not even gonna say anything about that lool.
Edited by REDNECK (forum moderator): Please do NOT continue to make pointless posts.Last edited by jesus; 23-01-2008 at 12:46 AM.
-
23-01-2008, 01:05 AM #50
I don't think so, the army is there to defend the country, it's a totally different world than a murderer murdering innocent people, armies go to war, etc, so it's not the same. But I do see what you mean, because they do kill people. Originally Posted by Warezkid2
Considerating the circumstances of 'I was in fear of my life' situations, the person who killed someone in that situation shouldn't die anyway, and in a lot of cases in court, if proven this to be the case of self defense, they don't normally execute them. I don't think it would be a good idea to execute them for that anyway. Originally Posted by Warezkid2
Last edited by Agesilaus; 24-01-2008 at 07:11 AM.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts