Moderation Changes Cont.

[Neversoft]

How come all these decisions are made without getting feedback before they're implemented?

[PaulMacC]

I've just been told that if I get cautioned then Im fired lol.

[Slowpoke]

Sounds like a good idea.

http://www.habboxforum.com/showpost....44&postcount=4 - I'd just like to refer you to that post of yours, then I'd like you to look through your recent posts and then mine, then I'd like you to compare them

What sounds good, Harry? :rolleyes:

[today]

Editing = Visible. If something is edited, it'll give some insight as to what your standards to editing are. If something isn't edited, then we know it may or may not in be in the guide.
Reports = As I said, stuff which members definitely don't see e.g. the infraction system CP. Moderators will see what moderators will see.

You're not quite grasping the concept of visibility. We see moderators, so we see how they moderate. But we don't see what they see each other because we're not moderators.


Have fun at the Dentist

I dont even want to go there with you anymore, we are clearly over. :rolleyes:

One would assume they will because it's an automatic system which won't pay attention to the fact Warnings were received before a policy change. I could be wrong, someone with the know-how feel free to correct me. But if I am right, DAMN THOSE AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS. GO HUMAN INPUT!!

If its anything like a system i've used before on another forum current ones doesnt effect the change unless you are warned then it will pick it up - unless super moderators have to go through members..

[Slowpoke]

I've just been told that if I get cautioned then Im fired lol.

Mhm, I think it's always been like that. Who told you?

[GommeInc]

I dont even want to go there with you anymore, we are clearly over. :rolleyes:

I take it you don't understand that members see what moderators do because what moderators do is visible to members

[PaulMacC]

Elkaa
I've messaged Nvrspk4 about 2 of the unfair warning's I recieved though I do think 5 for a caution is a bit too low.

[Slowpoke]

Elkaa
I've messaged Nvrspk4 about 2 of the unfair warning's I recieved though I do think 5 for a caution is a bit too low.

It's not. No-one can accidently break five rules before any expire. I do agree that the double posting rule needs to be reviewed though. Sometimes, people do accidently do it and still get warned for it (as in your case).

[Neversoft]

No-one can accidently break five rules before any expire.

It's easy to accidently break 5 rules in 2 months. :S

[GommeInc]

It's not. No-one can accidently break five rules before any expire. I do agree that the double posting rule needs to be reviewed though. Sometimes, people do accidently do it and still get warned for it (as in your case).

All they need to do is merge the posts together (or remove them, depending) and put an edit line on. A warning for a double post which clearly was accidental (same time, day and year) is pointless.