Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst 12345
Results 41 to 42 of 42
  1. #41
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    herne bay
    Posts
    11,625
    Tokens
    1,023

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    well i really enjoyed it. id heard loads of bad stuff about the way it was filmed, but regardless of whether it has been done before or not, i think it really worked.
    i love how there's an entire community that is based on theorising what happened after/about the whole monster and stuff. i think it shows that the movie was a huge success if you've got people thinking outside the box about it.
    apparently there's going to be a sequel, which i think would work really well, as long as they didn't just see it as a way to make more money. well obviously thats what films are for, but you get what i mean. i hope they dont make it so its really obvious that they're milking it.

  2. #42
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    4,162
    Tokens
    1,199

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    I thought it was OK. But a MAJOR disadvantageofthe handycam filming was that there was zero backstory, no cuts to an army base with an old man panicking, no president sending missile codes, just an oversized frog. I had to google it to find backstory and even then, it wasn't what I'd hoped for.

Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst 12345

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •