Freedom of speech being denied, when it's the law?

[JackBuddy]

Give reasons - Don't just say something and don't back it up. For example, do not say "Raise the limit for signature pictures" and leave it at that. Explain why you are suggesting your idea.

This thread is gay.

Thanks.

[Sammeth.]

Thanks.

Freedom of Speech! I did it.

Edit: Anyway, I think that rule is for when you are asking or suggesting or giving feedback. Not for opinions. May be mistaken though...

[Nemo]

Freedom of Speech! I did it.

Edit: Anyway, I think that rule is for when you are asking or suggesting or giving feedback. Not for opinions. May be mistaken though...

When you give feedback, you give your opinion on the matter, thats what feedback is.

[Hiro]

This thread has made my day.
I saw the title and just lol'd.

Freedom of speech is allowed, but anywhere you go some will get censored, for example, telling a police officer that he is a low-life scum, you'd probably get taken in for the night. Just like on here you get an infraction if you were to call management the same.
Someone go call management on another forum to "go **** themselves" and tell me the result...please.

[Sammeth.]

When you give feedback, you give your opinion on the matter, thats what feedback is.

Good point but I meant feedback as in starting threads and creating them to suggest points of improvement etc etc. As the rule states "Use reasons to back up your ideas" rather than feedback in the form of "This thread brings up a good point". However I was trying to make a point. I mean, if I had replied with "This thread is good." I doubt anyone would have raised the rule that I should back up my claims. The whole reason I said the thread was gay was to see double standards, and to see if people were practicing what they were preaching. Innit.

[Nemo]

Good point but I meant feedback as in starting threads and creating them to suggest points of improvement etc etc. As the rule states "Use reasons to back up your ideas" rather than feedback in the form of "This thread brings up a good point". However I was trying to make a point. I mean, if I had replied with "This thread is good." I doubt anyone would have raised the rule that I should back up my claims. The whole reason I said the thread was gay was to see double standards, and to see if people were practicing what they were preaching. Innit.

Ahh i see, well, have fun with that.

[Sammeth.]

Ahh i see, well, have fun with that.

I was going to but it kinda failed :eusa_ange

[---MAD---]

Sure freedom of right exists on the internet but once you register on a community where you agree to their terms of services / forum rules where the admin at any time without reason or prior notice can do whatever they want with the data then freedom of speech is void. If the admins decide to ban a user, or delete a post, edit a post or shut down their web site .. that's just up to them. If they feel content isn't "fitting" for their web site they can take action.

This is why as I mentioned earlier, freedom of speech is void on non-political forums.

[Nemo]

Sure freedom of right exists on the internet but once you register on a community where you agree to their terms of services / forum rules where the admin at any time without reason or prior notice can do whatever they want with the data then freedom of speech is void. If the admins decide to ban a user, or delete a post, edit a post or shut down their web site .. that's just up to them. If they feel content isn't "fitting" for their web site they can take action.

This is why as I mentioned earlier, freedom of speech is void on non-political forums.

Because that really puts up your popularity with the members

[JackBuddy]

To conclude this thread, I have come to the decision that NaughtyNemo and Neversoft's bans were unfair.