British ISPs sensoring Wikipedia articles

[Decode]

If I saved this image, would I be considered to be downloading child porn?

It would depend how you look at it. Some people see it as child nudity which is different from child porn. How ever you have already downloaded it as it is in your temp internet files.

[J0SH]

They're not as good ISP because they stopped you being able to edit a page with a nude infant? Yeah. :rolleyes:

[Calon]

Your lucky that your internet hasn't been terminated for viewing it.

[today]

i get a 404 error, lol.

[HotelUser]

IT

IS

NOT

CHILD PORNOGRAPHY
Learn the damn difference between nudity and pornography.

It's still illegal?

[Recursion]

So why do they suddenly decide to block a 40 year old image...?

[Kevin]

I think it's sick anyway. It should have never been published. I dont know how they got away with that, i know it was banned in the UK but to even have the nerve to launch it in other country's, if i saw that album in the shops, id be like ***

[HotelUser]

So why do they suddenly decide to block a 40 year old image...?

I do think it should be blocked, but you do pose a good point. They should have banned this image entirely, after countries began banning the album cover. Banning it 40 years later is weird.

[awelsh]

I do think it should be blocked, but you do pose a good point. They should have banned this image entirely, after countries began banning the album cover. Banning it 40 years later is weird.

Well, its up to us what we can and cant view really. But it is pretty sick, what I don't agree with is the fact they blocked us from editing pages. Thats just annoying.

[Recursion]

Wikipedia blocked us from editing the pages without signing up because the ISPs were edit-bombing and vandalizing the Wiki.