Discover Habbo's history
Treat yourself with a Secret Santa gift.... of a random Wiki page for you to start exploring Habbo's history!
Happy holidays!
Celebrate with us at Habbox on the hotel, on our Forum and right here!
Join Habbox!
One of us! One of us! Click here to see the roles you could take as part of the Habbox community!


Page 5 of 9 FirstFirst 123456789 LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 89
  1. #41
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Essex
    Posts
    23,585
    Tokens
    9,258

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Voiding View Post
    The media could say its the worst thing in the world. They don't care what the media say, they don't listen to what they say, they don't take anything from what they say. They meet with all officials across the world and put data together to see what the result is. WHO isn't a organisation that makes decisions on media's doings, not even a little bit.

    And all of info in the post before this was copied from the Times Newspaper.
    I've never said that, what I did say is that the WHO are hyping it up aswell:

    Not alot have died, "tabiflu" or whatever isn't needed for the majority of cases (so NHS won't be strained other than for the whinos (who should be shot on the spot to be fair)).
    I bet the WHO haven't deducted all the people who have had it and are better. They haven't even proved it is mutating! If it is, it hasn't done anything :/ The WHO keep tangling a web and getting their wires crossed, first by suggesting LOADS died in the first week, by taking second hand information from Mexico, who they (WHO) of all people should know should get their own information and NOT rely on a unreliable source - it's basic medical practice.

    Also, you just made your information and rant about media vs. WHO useless, by saying you've copied it out of the Times Newspaper, they're included in media who are just as wrong and unreliable as the WHO. Want common sense advice? Don't panic or rely on something that keeps getting it wrong

    Quote Originally Posted by Sammeth. View Post
    The flu is no worse than from when it was on level one or level two. Its no different. It just happens that now on Level 6 its more widespread. Just because its on level 6 doens't mean that all of a sudden its more lethal, or more deadly. Absolutely nothing to worry about in the UK as its a rubbish virus. Can't even kill, jeez, its like the dweeb of pandemics.
    Like a late night lay with a squirrel you were lead to believe would be a great lover Sad times for me
    Last edited by GommeInc; 13-06-2009 at 02:24 PM.

  2. #42
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    6,572
    Tokens
    584

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GommeInc View Post
    I've never said that, what I did say is that the WHO are hyping it up aswell:

    Not alot have died, "tabiflu" or whatever isn't needed for the majority of cases (so NHS won't be strained other than for the whinos (who should be shot on the spot to be fair)).
    I bet the WHO haven't deducted all the people who have had it and are better. They haven't even proved it is mutating! If it is, it hasn't done anything :/ The WHO keep tangling a web and getting their wires crossed, first by suggesting LOADS died in the first week, by taking second hand information from Mexico, who they (WHO) of all people should know should get their own information and NOT rely on a unreliable source - it's basic medical practice.

    Also, you just made your information and rant about media vs. WHO useless, by saying you've copied it out of the Times Newspaper, they're included in media who are just as wrong and unreliable as the WHO. Want common sense advice? Don't panic or rely on something that keeps getting it wrong


    Like a late night lay with a squirrel you were lead to believe would be a great lover Sad times for me
    So the worlds top doctors and scientists are unreliable and wrong aswell? Because if you think what they say is wrong then maybe you should try becoming the worlds top scientist/doctor?

  3. #43
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Essex
    Posts
    23,585
    Tokens
    9,258

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    The results they've come up with, and the pointless theories they come up with, have not materialised. If they're top docs, they need shooting, because they're doing a terrible job by attempting to cause panic, getting things wrong, lying and just generally being somewhat useless. Also, they're not the people preventing it, what's preventing swine flu, or attempting to, are the unknown majority of nurses, doctors and human spirit - and tamiflu which has been around for years.

    What fascinates you about a flu that isn't that amazing, by the way?

  4. #44
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    6,572
    Tokens
    584

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GommeInc View Post
    The results they've come up with, and the pointless theories they come up with, have not materialised. If they're top docs, they need shooting, because they're doing a terrible job by attempting to cause panic, getting things wrong, lying and just generally being somewhat useless. Also, they're not the people preventing it, what's preventing swine flu, or attempting to, are the unknown majority of nurses, doctors and human spirit - and tamiflu which has been around for years.

    What fascinates you about a flu that isn't that amazing, by the way?
    Of what Tamiflu could become useless and millions of pounds and dollars in the bin if it builds a immunity to the vaccine. Theres no doubting it will spread to millions, do you expect the NHS to cope with them all? You can't just give someone a tamiflu and let them go home and rest because what if they get worse? Spread it to other people.

    So no matter what you say it will spread and spread until who knows, within 4 months they predict 35% of the UK's population could fall ill to the virus. Thats about 21 million people. Gonna stick them in a hospital?

    What fascinates me is what you people think of it and don't really get what the figures will be.

  5. #45
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Essex
    Posts
    23,585
    Tokens
    9,258

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Voiding View Post
    Of what Tamiflu could become useless and millions of pounds and dollars in the bin if it builds a immunity to the vaccine. Theres no doubting it will spread to millions, do you expect the NHS to cope with them all? You can't just give someone a tamiflu and let them go home and rest because what if they get worse? Spread it to other people.

    So no matter what you say it will spread and spread until who knows, within 4 months they predict 35% of the UK's population could fall ill to the virus. Thats about 21 million people. Gonna stick them in a hospital?

    What fascinates me is what you people think of it and don't really get what the figures will be.
    Ah but you're believing medical professional hype, believing it will become immune when it hasn't and there is no evidence suggesting it will. It's been over a month now and yet the flu is as harmless as ever - the media itself got bored of it for a while.

    Also, hospitals are suggesting people stay at home and NOT go to hospital. Are you suggesting people who think they may have it go pass hundreds of people to hospital? See, I've pulled that argument up against you.

    And spread and spread until what? People get better? Like the load of people who got it first? The Glaswegian couple for example?

    You seem to have no evidence to fall on, other than rumours and theories, while it's evidence that the flu isn't as bad as people say it is because look around you, it hasn't killed a single brit as far as I am aware - one person was very ill, but nothing else arised from that.
    Last edited by GommeInc; 13-06-2009 at 04:18 PM.

  6. #46
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    6,572
    Tokens
    584

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GommeInc View Post
    Ah but you're believing medical professional hype, believing it will become immune when it hasn't and there is no evidence suggesting it will. It's been over a month now and yet the flu is as harmless as ever - the media itself got bored of it for a while.

    Also, hospitals are suggesting people stay at home and NOT go to hospital. Are you suggesting people who think they may have it go pass hundreds of people to hospital? See, I've pulled that argument up against you.

    And spread and spread until what? People get better? Like the load of people who got it first? The Glaswegian couple for example?

    You seem to have no evidence to fall on, other than rumours and theories, while it's evidence that the flu isn't as bad as people say it is because look around you, it hasn't killed a single brit as far as I am aware - one person was very ill, but nothing else arised from that.
    Correction, a few were critical in Scotland. As some viruses, they develop immunity. They CAN become more dangerous. I am saying if 21m brits got it. There would be deaths, no doubts about it. This flu has already been proven to go from a mild fever and being sick to life threatening pneumonia over night. Lets just give it 4 months or so and see how it is going yeah?

    Edit: Also it is rising by 2000+ more cases every day, which gradually gets higher and higher per day.
    Last edited by efq; 13-06-2009 at 04:25 PM.

  7. #47
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    2,424
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/8099832.stm

    First UK death from swine flu, on BBC News now. Not sure what underlying symptoms he/she had though (the news is still breaking as I typed this).

  8. #48
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    6,572
    Tokens
    584

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Plank View Post
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/8099832.stm

    First UK death from swine flu, on BBC News now. Not sure what underlying symptoms he/she had though (the news is still breaking as I typed this).
    Yeah, I thought it might be the Scots to get the first death because of the few critical patients they had. But for all we know he could of just had other problems with his body and the virus wasn't the cause. Hopefully it doesn't kill anymore. It's a shame its 'unstoppable'.
    Last edited by efq; 14-06-2009 at 07:36 PM.

  9. #49
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    3,917
    Tokens
    4,115

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    At least its still not as deadly as the normal flu and never will be. Probably had health problems along with it.
    Sammeth.

  10. #50
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    6,572
    Tokens
    584

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sammeth. View Post
    At least its still not as deadly as the normal flu and never will be. Probably had health problems along with it.
    They said the UK will feel the full deadly wrath of the Swine Flu in Late July/August. I don't know why though.

    Sammeth. You can't say that, no-one can. No-one knows if this virus will mutate to something dangerous. It's unpredictable and can do anything so you can rule it out of being deadly as the normal flu because its early. For all we know it could change into something that kills you instantly and makes you explode... an extreme example before you scream at me

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •