WHY WAS MY THREAD DELETED.

[Catzsy]

Maybe if you read the thread or saw it you could comment about it. There was only his post in it and it was a link to ebay and a picture

Gordon Banks has posted 10 times in the thread, mwah and it was an advertisment that Ebay removed as inappropriate and a lot more than a picture mwah. Thanks

[Lost]

Gordon Banks has posted 10 times in the thread, mwah and it was an advertisment that Ebay removed as inappropriate and a lot more than a picture mwah. Thanks

I rest my case.

[lick]

Gordon Banks has posted 10 times in the thread, mwah and it was an advertisment that Ebay removed as inappropriate and a lot more than a picture mwah. Thanks

there was a picture :S i saw it......it was talking about sex tho

I rest my case.

about what :S Catzsy did not say he was arguing in it like you did...

[Clowgon]

Lol. GordonBanks it seems every thread you make an argument starts up, why don't you just take the message? This thread alone tells you why it was removed, it's full of arguments and no doubt the thread you're talking about was also full of arguments. The funny thing is since you're complaining about arguments being against the rules no one has actually closed this thread yet...

I agree. Wootzeh just stop with the hissy fit, stop with the attention seeking threads and just get over it.

A decision has been made to remove your thread, let it be. You have to remember that there's a few ppl on here who are a bit young so you have watch what you say and post.

I think this thread should be closed.

[Lost]

about what :S Catzsy did not say he was arguing in it like you did...

You said he was doing something completely harmless (posting a picture on this thread). It got removed and this lead to aggressive and argumentitive behaviour from GordonBanks:

I'm sick of moderators taking action against my posts/threads just because it is me who posts then

Originally Posted by Catzsy
I removed it from the forum and told you why and please do not post this again or further action will have to be taken. You can pm Matt Garner for a review of the action I took. Thanks.

no i cba with that, im sick of being treated like a ******* child

I mean fair enough it's not exactly an argument but this is my point, nearly every thread Gordon Banks has leads to something like this, not just doing something harmless and posting an Ebay link with a picture on it, or else it wouldn't of gotten removed.

[GordonBanks]

Lol. GordonBanks it seems every thread you make an argument starts up, why don't you just take the message? This thread alone tells you why it was removed, it's full of arguments and no doubt the thread you're talking about was also full of arguments. The funny thing is since you're complaining about arguments being against the rules no one has actually closed this thread yet...

Wrong, you can't comment on something you didn't see can you? People thought the thread was funny. *Removed*
Edited by Catzsy [Forum Super Moderator]: Please do not do not be rude to others. Thanks.

[Lost]

Well since it was REMOVED i can only make the ******* assumption that something was wrong with it. I mean some MODS take it too far but I mean they're not THAT bad.

And me shut up? says the cautioned member. Maybe you should take the hint and *Removed* thanks.

Edited by Catzsy [Forum Super Moderator]: Please do not make inappropriate and rude remarks to other members. Thanks.

[GordonBanks]

there was a picture :S i saw it......it was talking about sex tho



about what :S Catzsy did not say he was arguing in it like you did...

It wasn't talking about sex, it was about putting a cockerel into a cardboard box.

I agree. Wootzeh just stop with the hissy fit, stop with the attention seeking threads and just get over it.

A decision has been made to remove your thread, let it be. You have to remember that there's a few ppl on here who are a bit young so you have watch what you say and post.

I think this thread should be closed.

No-one asked for your opinion.

You said he was doing something completely harmless (posting a picture on this thread). It got removed and this lead to aggressive and argumentitive behaviour from GordonBanks:






I mean fair enough it's not exactly an argument but this is my point, nearly every thread Gordon Banks has leads to something like this, not just doing something harmless and posting an Ebay link with a picture on it, or else it wouldn't of gotten removed.

If you'd been given as many warnings/infractions as me unfairly then you'd be annoyed at the moderation of this forum. Once again, the thread didn't get removed because of 'arguing'. So stop posting now.

[GordonBanks]

Well since it was REMOVED i can only make the ******* assumption that something was wrong with it. I mean some MODS take it too far but I mean they're not THAT bad.

And me shut up? says the cautioned member. Maybe you should take the hint and *Removed*
thanks.

DONT MAKE THE ASSUMPTION THEN. WHEN YOU DONT KNOW THE FACTS.

Edited by Catzsy [Forum Super Moderator]: Please do not make double posts within the 15 minute editing time. Thanks.

[Mentor]

For the record, the image was posted directly on the forum with no warning but I guess as we're arguing that it shouldn't be on the forums at all, its not relevant to the overall discussion of the rule however it does validate the actions in this specific case.

Indeed, i dont question that, my thought is though, that with a link it should be valid. As within the thread people have said it would not be.
I'm aware the circumstances that results in this thread are different from those i'm auguring should be allowed.

Yes it is, we're working to change that from hearsay to actual writing.

EDIT: Upon further reflection, having been involved in moderation since the beginning of time, I realize that there never WAS a rule that you could link to swearing content etc. with a warning. Someone made that up and its become accepted. But looks like we're making it a rule wot!

Not quite, the rules original form was as a clause to the offsite linking rules. At one point linking to another webpage was near impossible as the rules meant if the other site on it contained a link to a site containing a link to inappropite content, it would not be allowed.
Since the content of other sites is not under the control of habbox and users know they are following links at there own risk as per the tos agreed to on sign up - it made sense to allow linking to content that would not be allowed on the normal forums. Afterall it is not habbox's job to moderate the entire Internet.

There was a pinned thread detailing the rule attached to the web forums at one point, but this is 3/4 years back easy. The rule seems to have continued to be used though despite no longer having a written form.

The rule though, does make sense, so putting it in to writeing now would be a good move imo