If someone killed the queen...

[nooblah123]

Why would you kill the queen anyway? :L

[Alkaz]

To become the monarch?

[Black_Apalachi]

To become the monarch?

Yeah any film where that happens should be banned. "Yeah I killed the king so now I'M the king. Ha!" NOOOO!! FAIL FOR ADMITTING IT!!!!1

[ifuseekamy]

Fair enough, the PM does a lot for this country also, but he doesn't get to live in an enormous palace funded by the tax payer. She does a lot for the country, fair enough but there's people that work harder than her that don't get the benefits she does, it's disgusting.

Actually it works the same as the expenses that politicians receive. Only Buckingham palace actually release theirs annually. Also a large percentage of it goes back in public service taxes.

The monarch cant dissolve parliament no more They took that power, along with the rest away

No they didn't, but they want to take away. It says a lot that the government want total control of the state and to remove the ability for them to be removed from power.

[Browney]

Similarly, if I was Charles and somebody shot me mam I'd permit execution of the assasin. And if government didn't like it, I'd just dissolve Parliament. :eusa_danc

On further evaluation, if I was Charles and have been waiting to get on that throne for years, I'd probably knight the assasin.

[AlexOC]

THE *****!

Edited by Hecktix (Forum Moderator): Please try not to make pointless remarks.

I was expressing my views on how the queen operates.

It's not pointless.

[Describe]

The question should be: Why hasn't someone killed her already? I don't find any need for a queen and considering I am Scottish I do not regard her as important.

[Caution]

The question should be: Why hasn't someone killed her already? I don't find any need for a queen and considering I am Scottish I do not regard her as important.

Exactly.

Actually it works the same as the expenses that politicians receive. Only Buckingham palace actually release theirs annually. Also a large percentage of it goes back in public service taxes.

No they didn't, but they want to take away. It says a lot that the government want total control of the state and to remove the ability for them to be removed from power.

Politicians are somewhat useful though. She's not required.

[ifuseekamy]

Exactly.

Politicians are somewhat useful though. She's not required.

The main reasons would be tourism, Britishness and democracy. The monarchy has been far more devoted to the country than any politician, Hitler didn't call the queen mum the most dangerous woman in Europe for no reason. Really the queen pretty much is a politician based on her duties.

[VirtualG]

They wont be sentenced to death but they will be assasinated by some patriotic civilian. I would take a bullet for the Queen, therefore I'd blow off someones head to save her. I would kill someone for killing ht equeen but I would if they murdered the entire royal family,, which is near impossible with the Mi6 security.
Someone said that why hasnt someone tried to kill her yet? Well, there have been many attempts on many British queens. A LOT of them have been kept secret. And dont call her pointless because she is the main ruler of the british empire. She can fire the priministers of Australia, New Zealand, United Kingdom, etc... I wouldn't say thats a pointless job, she keeps them all inline.