could i see evidence of those first two? cause there isnt any ive seen kthx. many of those facts are hearsay and lies and dont have any legitimate evidence.
because thats when his insurance policy ran out, and he took on such a big terror policy because the towers WERE ATTACKED BEFORE. which ALSO explains the supposed "evidence" of the terror pamphlet that had the twin towers in cross hairs, it was already a famous terror target.
at the officers one: the entire building was on fire, man. im sure being in the building was INCREDIBLY confusing, an officer isnt an engineer or an architect. i wouldnt rely on questionable witness accounts before SCIENCE.
if there were so many people involved in the 9/11 conspiracy as these people claim, there is absolutely no possible way none of them would come out and said something. i dont see how president bush could pull off something as intricate as the 9/11 attacks, have so many people involved and and coordinate so many people, but virtually fail at every single other thing he does. he couldnt keep anything else under wraps, i dont see why he would be able to keep the biggest conspiracy in history the same way.
anyway, im done arguing lol, if you dont even want to bother to look up the counter arguments then fine you can be stubborn im not gonna make you give up your beliefs.




Reply With Quote








