Discover Habbo's history
Treat yourself with a Secret Santa gift.... of a random Wiki page for you to start exploring Habbo's history!
Happy holidays!
Celebrate with us at Habbox on the hotel, on our Forum and right here!
Join Habbox!
One of us! One of us! Click here to see the roles you could take as part of the Habbox community!


Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 65
  1. #41
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Essex
    Posts
    23,585
    Tokens
    9,258

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Blinger View Post
    So you have to ask a mod/admin to reopen a thread which could take a while to get a reply instead of just being able to open it and get a reply within five minutes..
    That does seem like a downside :/ Surely it would be better to just allow it, and if it breaks any sort of rule harsh punishments should be taken into consideration? Afterall, alot of people will probably do it harmlessly, rather than do it for the sake of malicious purposes

  2. #42
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Dublin, Ireland.
    Posts
    13,083
    Tokens
    2,964
    Habbo
    Yet

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Can't the feature be disabled in parts of the forum? like there is no need for it in spam
    ofwgktadgaf

  3. #43
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    7,554
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Richie View Post
    Can't the feature be disabled in parts of the forum? like there is no need for it in spam
    I needed it.

  4. #44
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    5,542
    Tokens
    4,023
    Habbo
    -S-G-

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Richie View Post
    Contradicting myself and making a typo are two different things.



    But I thought it was the moderators jobs to send a pm / warn pointless posts?
    Wheres the typo though? It was a clear contradiction :S.

  5. #45
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    London
    Posts
    7,392
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    I see the point about things missing from the rules, such as the Warez things.

    In terms of the VIP rules we don't have these in the FAQ they are in the VIP forums, I'll get this added to those rules and on top of that by the way, all VIPs (including people who get VIP in the future) are forced to read that thread Garion made.
    Last edited by Hecktix; 01-03-2010 at 02:02 AM.
    "You live more riding bikes like these for 5 minutes than most people do in their entire lives"

    RIP Marco Simoncelli ~ 1987 - 2011
    Previous Habbox Roles: Shows Manager, Help Desk Manager, Forum Moderator, Forum Super Moderator, Assistant Forum Manager, Forum Manager, Assistant General Manager (Staff), General Manager.

    Retired from Habbox May 2011


  6. #46
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    12,405
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Oli View Post
    ... We thought we could incorporate this in to work with those abusing their VIP features, so if someone is closing or opening threads to work to their advantage within an argument it can be dealt with on this line (whether it be a PM or a warning/infraction). ...
    Will this not be difficult to enforce though? The usual example I see of this is people posting their penny's worth then closing the thread before anyone else has chance to get a word in. There's not really any way you can prove the intent behind the closure of the thread because they could easily claim they were simply bored of the thread and no longer had any interest in what anybody had to say...

    Quote Originally Posted by sex View Post
    ill miss it and i dont see why you should get rid of it because of two users lol
    I agree but as far as I can tell, the whole issue regarding the filter was because of just one or two users as well.

    Quote Originally Posted by Gupta View Post
    Yeah I agree. I like having the feature to close threads where the question has been answered.
    Why though? It makes no real difference and if the feature didn't exist, I'm sure the rule would be reintroduced whereby one can send a request to a moderator to close a particular thread for them.

    The thread closure feature honestly seems really gimmicky - as if it was just a feature added onto the VIP package for the sake of it back in the day just to give it an extra selling point. Obviously there's no longer any purchase involved with VIP so there's no need for unnecessary gimmicks like this to make it look better.

  7. #47
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    London
    Posts
    7,392
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    It's usually pretty obvious as to why people close their threads and at the end of the day Forum or General Management will always have the final say
    "You live more riding bikes like these for 5 minutes than most people do in their entire lives"

    RIP Marco Simoncelli ~ 1987 - 2011
    Previous Habbox Roles: Shows Manager, Help Desk Manager, Forum Moderator, Forum Super Moderator, Assistant Forum Manager, Forum Manager, Assistant General Manager (Staff), General Manager.

    Retired from Habbox May 2011


  8. #48
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    12,405
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Well the example I suggested could be a genuine reason or it could be a sly move but it would be pretty much impossible to read the mind of the person to decide which it was. Fair enough though I suppose

  9. #49
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    5,542
    Tokens
    4,023
    Habbo
    -S-G-

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Black_Apalachi View Post
    Obviously there's no longer any purchase involved with VIP so there's no need for unnecessary gimmicks like this to make it look better.
    Christmas VIP is purchased

    Quote Originally Posted by Black_Apalachi View Post
    Well the example I suggested could be a genuine reason or it could be a sly move but it would be pretty much impossible to read the mind of the person to decide which it was. Fair enough though I suppose
    I rarely see people closing the thread for their advantage, so there's no point removing the rule because of a few people.

    I get annoyed when I write a big reply to some threads and find its closed when I press reply, cant do anything about it. Just move on.

  10. #50
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Kent
    Posts
    4,183
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    So you want to get rid / ruin a feature that has been with VIP members for over 5 years just becuase you cant reply to the thread becuase it was closed. The only reason i bother with VIP is for this feature, otherwise i wud just go normal user with stars. Dont ruin something that isnt broken :S All what needs to be done is saying you cant re-open them like it was, you cant start telling people that they can only close certain type of threads, otherwise theres no point in the feature and its ruins. Its been fine for 5 years? why change it...

Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •