Management at Habbox Forum take the protection of our users of all ages, particularly those who are younger and more vulnerable, extremely seriously. I am aware of three occasions in which matters have had to be taken to the police in my time as Management, one of which I was directly involved with after reporting a member who posed as a Police Officer. This matter was taken seriously by myself, other members of management and indeed, the police to the extent that they paid a visit to the offenders home. My point is that we are very aware of the potential risk to our members and to clarify to you guys that we do take decisive action when a potential risk is exposed.
This however, is not to say that the risk is quite as serious as you may think or some may have suggested. Two of those three were a false alarm and an ongoing investigation is yet to be confirmed. So actually, given our membership base, the prevalence of paedophiles on Habbox Forum is not quite as considerable as some of you may think! In fact I'd argue it was pretty much non-existent.
When members post their pictures they do so at their own risk. I am not trying to shift responsibility here, because we do try and protect our members, but at the end of the day if people choose to post their pictures on the forum then the (minor) risks that stem from that are theirs to take and there is in fact, very little we can do other than restrict the posting of pictures altogether, which I am not inclined to do as I think this is an overreaction.
The best thing we could really do right now is restrict guest access to the Photography section of the forum. I think implementing a time limit or a specific usergroup that needs joining is a waste of time - if a paedophile wanted to see those pictures then they would simply join those groups or make the required amount of posts until they could and lets face it, when they did, they'd be disappointed. Pictures of the nature we allow in that thread are commonplace on the internet in general, I do not believe the risk is any more considerable here than anywhere else.







Obviously doesn't eradicate the problem but nice to put a stumbling block there 










