Paul 100% confirms the normal chat will be back for trusted users

[MKR&*42]

Well tbh if you've been banned for misusing the chat, why would they let you have full chat back?

Half of those or more are unfair. I hardly think I deserve 5 flooding bans in a row when I flooded on not one of the accounts.
In other cases (not mine cause i genuinely deserve a few of those bans but meh), people get unfair bans as we have seen in the past 2 days lmfao - so if it's based on that a lot will complain.

[lawrawrrr]

Half of those or more are unfair. I hardly think I deserve 5 flooding bans in a row when I flooded on not one of the accounts.
In other cases (not mine cause i genuinely deserve a few of those bans but meh), people get unfair bans as we have seen in the past 2 days lmfao - so if it's based on that a lot will complain.

When you appeal a ban it gets removed if it's deemed unfair. As far as the warnings/mutes go, they aren't stored on your account are they?

I think they'll just be looking at people who have been banned for sexual roleplay in the past. That's what they want to get rid of.

Or, they could start everyone from scratch and if you are banned/warned for this, then you get the limited. If your account is over 'x' days old i mean.

[Zak]

Well tbh if you've been banned for misusing the chat, why would they let you have full chat back?

To be fair though there is a distinct difference from messing around and being serious, mods should see that

[MKR&*42]

When you appeal a ban it gets removed if it's deemed unfair. As far as the warnings/mutes go, they aren't stored on your account are they?

I think they'll just be looking at people who have been banned for sexual roleplay in the past. That's what they want to get rid of.

Or, they could start everyone from scratch and if you are banned/warned for this, then you get the limited. If your account is over 'x' days old i mean.

Starting from scratch would be the best bet aha^

and in the bold, I'm sure MODs can see how many times a user has been cautioned? Not sure aha. An ex-Hobba might know but meh.

[lawrawrrr]

To be fair though there is a distinct difference from messing around and being serious, mods should see that

Yeah but like I've said, if you have been warned/banned multiple times for sexual roleplay, and that's what they're trying to get rid of, why would they let 'convicted felons' (yknow what I mean) have that opportunity back?

---------- Post added 08-07-2012 at 01:57 PM ----------

Starting from scratch would be the best bet aha^

and in the bold, I'm sure MODs can see how many times a user has been cautioned? Not sure aha. An ex-Hobba might know but meh.

They must realise there's too many fake cautions and stuff, surely?

[MKR&*42]

Yeah but like I've said, if you have been warned/banned multiple times for sexual roleplay, and that's what they're trying to get rid of, why would they let 'convicted felons' (yknow what I mean) have that opportunity back?

---------- Post added 08-07-2012 at 01:57 PM ----------



They must realise there's too many fake cautions and stuff, surely?

I'm not sure if they can see the chatlog combined with each caution. And I'm not sure if there's an official system which displays if a caution was falsely given out or not aha, hopefully there is though :S

[Zak]

because theres a difference between sexual roleplay between members just messing around and serious offenders who truly mean it, in 07 i told a gay guy to suck my you know what, banned till 2020. Though I appealed three years later and let off because its obviously a joke and if they actually did their moderating properly they would have realised that at the time

[lawrawrrr]

I'm not sure if they can see the chatlog combined with each caution. And I'm not sure if there's an official system which displays if a caution was falsely given out or not aha, hopefully there is though :S

They probably can't.... but neither can they know if a caution is false. The warnings for blocking etc they can't prove/disprove, which is why I don't think they can store them. They get sent automatically when someone reports you ;l

[geo]

I have only been banned around 70 times @Intersocial;

[MKR&*42]

I have only been banned around 70 times @Intersocial;

More than me, disgraceful.

I remember my first ban ever *+*.