Next-Gen iPhone (iPhone 5?)

[samsaBEAR]

I got the iPhone 4s last year so i shall not be buying a new phone for several years

Several years?! Phones will be able to cook breakfast by then!

[SackRace]

Several years?! Phones will be able to cook breakfast by then!

I take good care of it

[GommeInc]

snip

Answer my question please: Where did I say you were happy that Apple inconvenienced their customers to gain money? I read your wall of text again and your over-reactive response didn't seem to answer my questions (again).

[HotelUser]

Answer my question please: Where did I say you were happy that Apple inconvenienced their customers to gain money? I read your wall of text again and your over-reactive response didn't seem to answer my questions (again).

I'm seriously beginning to question on what merits you've questioned my ability to read and how you've called me a troll when I've spelt it out as crystal clear as humanly possible in my previous post as to exactly what I meant with regards to me not being happy about Apple's cords, but me understanding unlike you that they do it to make money. In my previous response it is quite evident that I never said you said I was happy about the cords, but that I said what I said to express (again...) that I am not happy about Apple's cords, but unlike you I understand that they do it to make money (okay, I covered that twice in this paragraph so maybe you've grasped it now). Since you quite clearly failed to read my previous post, though, and because you probably will fail to read the above, I shall try conveying to you what happened in this thread (which you didn't read) via a dialogue:

GOMME: Weren't you the one preaching in another thread about how customers ought to be protected?

ME: Point out in my post where I stated I am happy about Apple using different adapters (in other words, I do not approve of Apple's custom cords)

GOMME: YOU CANT READ YOURE A TROLL IM GIVING YOU MINUS REP I HAVE THE POWER TO BELITTLE YOU

ME: *explains to you thoroughly what I meant by me not being happy about Apple using different adapters, using bold, italics and green font to make it very direct and easy to see what aspects of your post I am replying to*

GOMME: I CANT READ HURR

ME: My current and latest reaction to your inability to read (the underline here means this is a link Gomme, you click it)

[GommeInc]

I'm seriously beginning to question on what merits you've questioned my ability to read and how you've called me a troll when I've spelt it out as crystal clear as humanly possible in my previous post as to exactly what I meant with regards to me not being happy about Apple's cords, but me understanding unlike you that they do it to make money. In my previous response it is quite evident that I never said you said I was happy about the cords, but that I said what I said to express (again...) that I am not happy about Apple's cords, but unlike you I understand that they do it to make money (okay, I covered that twice in this paragraph so maybe you've grasped it now). Since you quite clearly failed to read my previous post, though, and because you probably will fail to read the above, I shall try conveying to you what happened in this thread (which you didn't read) via a dialogue:

GOMME: Weren't you the one preaching in another thread about how customers ought to be protected?

ME: Point out in my post where I stated I am happy about Apple using different adapters (in other words, I do not approve of Apple's custom cords)

GOMME: YOU CANT READ YOURE A TROLL IM GIVING YOU MINUS REP I HAVE THE POWER TO BELITTLE YOU

ME: *explains to you thoroughly what I meant by me not being happy about Apple using different adapters, using bold, italics and green font to make it very direct and easy to see what aspects of your post I am replying to*

GOMME: I CANT READ HURR

ME: My current and latest reaction to your inability to read (the underline here means this is a link Gomme, you click it)

Again, point out where I said you were happy that Apple used different adapters. The post you've quoted doesn't mention anything to do with you being happy, it isn't even in response to the adapters - hence the new paragraph.

And where did I say that Apple only do it to inconvenience their users? I never said it was, you assumed I did - because you love assumptions to start a pointless discussion.

And you say I can't read :rolleyes: What's worse is you made an image which really is a present from yourself to yourself, I just did the delivering.

Gomme 1 - HotelUser 0

[HotelUser]

Again, point out where I said you were happy that Apple used different adapters. The post you've quoted doesn't mention anything to do with you being happy, it isn't even in response to the adapters - hence the new paragraph.

And where did I say that Apple only do it to inconvenience their users? I never said it was, you assumed I did - because you love assumptions to start a pointless discussion.

And you say I can't read :rolleyes: What's worse is you made an image which really is a present from yourself to yourself, I just did the delivering.

Gomme 1 - HotelUser 0

Gomme are you incapable of reading my god damn posts?

I'm seriously beginning to question on what merits you've questioned my ability to read and how you've called me a troll when I've spelt it out as crystal clear as humanly possible in my previous post as to exactly what I meant with regards to me not being happy about Apple's cords, but me understanding unlike you that they do it to make money. In my previous response it is quite evident that I never said you said I was happy about the cords, but that I said what I said to express (again...) that I am not happy about Apple's cords, but unlike you I understand that they do it to make money (okay, I covered that twice in this paragraph so maybe you've grasped it now). Since you quite clearly failed to read my previous post, though, and because you probably will fail to read the above, I shall try conveying to you what happened in this thread (which you didn't read) via a dialogue:

Pretty sure I state right there that I never said you said I was happy with the cords. Pretty sure I pointed this out in my past post, AND my post before that, AND there's the fact that I never told you you thought I was happy with their cords to begin with. The score isn't Gomme 1 HotelUser 0, it's more like HotelUser 3 Gomme 0 because your ability to read my posts is equivalent to the ability of an ant to fly to the moon and back.

Like, seriously, I'm even beginning to question as to whether or not you even know how to read at all. Read what I post before you reply please, it just might prevent you from looking like a moron. Stop making stupid assumptions and stop replying with stupid and completely wrong statements which can be invalidated at the snap of my fingers by merely redirecting you back to my previous posts.

TO SPELL IT OUT FOR ABOUT THE 100TH TIME:

1. IN MY PAST TWO POSTS AS WELL AS THIS ONE I EXPLAINED EXACTLY WHAT I MEANT BY MY STATEMENT INCLUDING THE WORD "HAPPY" IN IT

2. YOURE MAKING ASSUMPTIONS IN THINKING I SAID YOU SAID THAT I WAS HAPPY WITH APPLES CORDS BECAUSE I NEVER ONCE SAID THAT MYSELF, I ASKED YOU TO TELL ME WHERE I SAID I WAS HAPPY WITH THE CORDS, IN RESPONSE TO YOU TELLING ME THEY HURT THE CONSUMERS

3. MY TEN YEAR OLD COUSIN HAS BETTER READING AND UNDERSTANDING SKILLS THAN YOU DO.

[GommeInc]

Pretty sure I state right there that I never said you said I was happy with the cords. Pretty sure I pointed this out in my past post, AND my post before that, AND there's the fact that I never told you you thought I was happy with their cords to begin with. The score isn't Gomme 1 HotelUser 0, it's more like HotelUser 3 Gomme 0 because your ability to read my posts is equivalent to the ability of an ant to fly to the moon and back.

So this post doesn't exist?

Point out in my post where I stated I am happy about Apple using different adapters (not that they're even the only or first company to do this, anyway).

You clearly suggest that I apparently said you were happy Apple inconvenience their users. So why say it? I never did.

Gomme 2 - HotelUser 0

And no response to my question: Where did I say Apple only do it to inconvenience their users?

Gomme 3 - HotelUser 0

</doesn't feed the troll>

[HotelUser]

So this post doesn't exist?

You clearly suggest that I apparently said you were happy Apple inconvenience their users. So why say it? I never did.

Gomme 2 - HotelUser 0

And no response to my question: Where did I say Apple only do it to inconvenience their users?

Gomme 3 - HotelUser 0

</doesn't feed the troll>

I did absolutely no such thing, you're putting words into my mouth.

I already explained my response to you, please refer to:

I'm seriously beginning to question on what merits you've questioned my ability to read and how you've called me a troll when I've spelt it out as crystal clear as humanly possible in my previous post as to exactly what I meant with regards to me not being happy about Apple's cords, but me understanding unlike you that they do it to make money. In my previous response it is quite evident that I never said you said I was happy about the cords, but that I said what I said to express (again...) that I am not happy about Apple's cords, but unlike you I understand that they do it to make money (okay, I covered that twice in this paragraph so maybe you've grasped it now). Since you quite clearly failed to read my previous post, though, and because you probably will fail to read the above, I shall try conveying to you what happened in this thread (which you didn't read) via a dialogue:

GOMME: Weren't you the one preaching in another thread about how customers ought to be protected?

ME: Point out in my post where I stated I am happy about Apple using different adapters (in other words, I do not approve of Apple's custom cords)

GOMME: YOU CANT READ YOURE A TROLL IM GIVING YOU MINUS REP I HAVE THE POWER TO BELITTLE YOU

ME: *explains to you thoroughly what I meant by me not being happy about Apple using different adapters, using bold, italics and green font to make it very direct and easy to see what aspects of your post I am replying to*

GOMME: I CANT READ HURR

ME: My current and latest reaction to your inability to read (the underline here means this is a link Gomme, you click it)

and

This is why your arguments suck:

1. It's the stupidest thing I've ever heard in my entire life that you actually thought Apple used those adapters to preach a stupid view like isolationism. It's possible you don't know anything about economics so I'll spell it out again for you, companies like to make money. I'm also shocked because I had previously thought you had a decently sound political head on your shoulders, but now that I've seen you take personal vendettas against companies to this all new level, I'm not so sure.

2. A brainless monkey could repeat the sentence that someone doesn't know how to read when you just don't know what to say, and when infact it's YOU who has completely failed to read what I said properly. Then again, a brainless monkey could also repeat insults directed toward a single company, and then consistently never back up their claims as to why that company is in the wrong.

3. Here's the difference between you and I. Instead of just arbitrarily and baselessly telling you that you don't know how to read (like how you've done in atleast 3 different posts in 2 different topics now), I'm going to tell you that you've invalidly read my post, and now I'm going to explain how you have (unlike you, I don't throw around such accusations and then fail to explain them). In your initial response to me you said:

And then in my response to that I thought oh, Gomme posted something. I am going to assume that Gomme is capable of reading and processing text, and so I'm going to highlight what Gomme said in green and respond to it directly in green writing as well, and hope that Gomme knows his colours. Proceeding this I told you to point out where I said I'm happy that Apple has different adapters. If you thought for a moment before writing up a reply to me perhaps you would of put two and two together and figured out that maybe the green text I wrote was in direct reply to the green text I highlighted in your reply to me, and that I was agreeing with you that it's stupid how Apple uses different adapters then everyone else (limits the consumer) (I'm using brackets and underlining text now to make sure you actually read what I say before making any further irrelevant and incorrect statements about my posts).

If you read my posts properly in the first place, then you would have learned two things about my opinion:
1. I think it's stupid that Apple uses specific adapters.
2. I think your suggestion that the reason they use specific adapters is completely stupid.

In regards to your reputation, the other day I considered gifting you negative reputation and explaining that I'm disappointed in that instead of arguing facts and backing them up, you've begin arguing rude accusations and not backing them up at all. But then I remembered that I actually don't care about reputation, and to further emphasize this point: when I was an administrator I never really bothered deleting my reputation even when others abused this power, so as a member I'm not even going to bother to post in the reputation removal thread. You can give me negative reputation until you're blue in the face, and I could care less. I'm more interested in arguing or discussing the facts of the topic at hand, not prancing about like a little girl and pettily wagging my finger lecturing about reputation, and talking of trolls and belittling

and

TO SPELL IT OUT FOR ABOUT THE 100TH TIME:

1. IN MY PAST TWO POSTS AS WELL AS THIS ONE I EXPLAINED EXACTLY WHAT I MEANT BY MY STATEMENT INCLUDING THE WORD "HAPPY" IN IT

2. YOURE MAKING ASSUMPTIONS IN THINKING I SAID YOU SAID THAT I WAS HAPPY WITH APPLES CORDS BECAUSE I NEVER ONCE SAID THAT MYSELF, I ASKED YOU TO TELL ME WHERE I SAID I WAS HAPPY WITH THE CORDS, IN RESPONSE TO YOU TELLING ME THEY HURT THE CONSUMERS

3. MY TEN YEAR OLD COUSIN HAS BETTER READING AND UNDERSTANDING SKILLS THAN YOU DO.

How many times do I have to spell it out for you? How many times do I have to tell you that when I said "Point out in my post where I stated I am happy about Apple using different adapters" that I was challenging your statement: "Weren't you the one preaching in another thread about how customers ought to be protected?" because I am infact not happy with their chargers.

The only troll you've fed with your replies is your own. Maybe take the next 20 minutes to read the thread for the first time and then reply to me. With every post you make I begin thinking you're even more and more helpless.


In the 8 years I've been at Habbox I have NEVER had to repeat myself so many times to get something through somebody's thick skull. I am begging you, for the love of jesus christ and everything good, read my post, and turn on your brain. I am not asking you to agree with me, I'm not even asking you to say something positive about Apple, I am asking you to use your god given brain to READ before you type.

[GommeInc]

I did absolutely no such thing, you're putting words into my mouth.

I'm not a moderator, super moderator or member of management, so I didn't edit your post to "put words in your mouth". You clearly said it in that post. Click the tiny pip, it takes you straight to the post where you accuse me of saying you're happy Apple use a seperate adapter, an inconvenience (unless you're saying it is a convenience Apple use a different adapter than what is the standard these days...?)

Gomme 4 - HotelUser 0

And again no response to the claim that I said Apple only do it to inconvenience their users.

Gomme 5 - HotelUser 0

I think I've won this argument, mainly because I've read the thread.

[HotelUser]

it takes you straight to the post where you accuse me of saying you're happy Apple use a seperate adapter, an inconvenience (unless you're saying it is a convenience Apple use a different adapter than what is the standard these days...?)

Oh, you want to know what I meant by that? Why don't you freaking read these posts:

http://www.habboxforum.com/showthrea...92#post7648692
http://www.habboxforum.com/showthrea...85#post7648585
http://www.habboxforum.com/showthrea...94#post7648194
http://www.habboxforum.com/showthrea...08#post7647508

In absolutely every single one of them I explain exactly what I meant by my sentence "Point out in my post where I stated I am happy about Apple using different adapters". Since you don't understand how the internet works, let me show you:

I was agreeing with you that it's stupid how Apple uses different adapters then everyone else

I've spelt it out as crystal clear as humanly possible in my previous post as to exactly what I meant with regards to me not being happy about Apple's cords, but me understanding unlike you that they do it to make money. In my previous response it is quite evident that I never said you said I was happy about the cords, but that I said what I said to express (again...) that I am not happy about Apple's cords, but unlike you I understand that they do it to make money

GOMME: Weren't you the one preaching in another thread about how customers ought to be protected?

ME: Point out in my post where I stated I am happy about Apple using different adapters (in other words, I do not approve of Apple's custom cords)

Pretty sure I state right there that I never said you said I was happy with the cords

How many times do I have to tell you that when I said "Point out in my post where I stated I am happy about Apple using different adapters" that I was challenging your statement: "Weren't you the one preaching in another thread about how customers ought to be protected?" because I am infact not happy with their chargers.

I addressed this FIVE times previously, and here you are still not even sure I know what you're on about. If you told me you were high and drunk at the same time I would believe you, because it would take that level of stupidity to make such a huge oversight.

Would you like me to explain what I meant by that sentence again Gomme? Or is five times enough for you?

it takes you straight to the post where you accuse me of saying you're happy Apple use a seperate adapter, an inconvenience (unless you're saying it is a convenience Apple use a different adapter than what is the standard these days...?)

Okay Gomme, you ready? Put your reading glasses on. Are they on? Good. I underlined the word "accuse" here. I did so because you are, again, putting words into my mouth. I never accused you of anything. If you don't understand what I meant by the sentence "Point out in my post where I stated I am happy about Apple using different adapters" then you only need to read the five quotes of my self above, and you should understand what I was saying

unless you're saying it is a convenience Apple use a different adapter than what is the standard these days...?

I'd like to dive into your mind and see how it works, truly I would. Here are several quotes of me in this thread:

I am infact not happy with their chargers.

Pretty sure I state right there that I never said you said I was happy with the cords. Pretty sure I pointed this out in my past post, AND my post before that, AND there's the fact that I never told you you thought I was happy with their cords to begin with.

ME: *explains to you thoroughly what I meant by me not being happy about Apple using different adapters, using bold, italics and green font to make it very direct and easy to see what aspects of your post I am replying to*

it's stupid how Apple uses different adapters then everyone else (limits the consumer)

Does it look like I think it's convenient that Apple uses different chargers? Do you have alzheimer's?

Gomme 4 - HotelUser 0

And again no response to the claim that I said Apple only do it to inconvenience their users.

a) I've made like five posts about the same thing now and you just keep ignoring it (refer to all the above quotes which you've just not read or blatantly ignored)
b) I've already replied to your "claim" waaaay earlier in the thread. I told you that I think Apple does it because Apple likes to make money:

I'm fairly certain it's to force users to purchase Apple specific charging adapters from either Apple or companies who pay Apple royalties as so Apple can make more money.

Apple does it because they want to make a crapload of money.

It's possible you don't know anything about economics so I'll spell it out again for you, companies like to make money.

I think it's pretty damn obvious based off of those three statements by me in three different posts that I think Apple do it to make money, and NOT to promote isolationism and NOT to only inconvenience users. So I think you might need to rethink that score

I think I've won this argument, mainly because I've read the thread.

Yeah *looks up at your statements and all my replies to them in PREVIOUS posts* it sure looks like you've read the thread :rolleyes: