Forum filter

[GoldenMerc]

Well there you go phil, thank me for showing you the fault of vbulletin.
you can say it privately, i won't embarrass you.

Not a fault, its human error

Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk

[sexpot]

fxck right off i did not kick u ****basher

just testing filter xx

lmao

Edited by e5 (Forum Super Moderator) - Please do not post pointlessly, thanks.

[Kardan]

The swear word itself clearly is in the filter, combining it with another word so that it doesn't get filtered absolutely is avoiding the filter.

The way I see it is that we don't want to see it on the forum - fair enough. But it was the filter's fault that it wasn't filtered - and the filter really should have filtered it. And when you type that, you WOULD expect the filter to pick that sort of thing up.

Personally I would have just edited the post, but not have issued a warning until the filter was updated. If people posted it multiple times, then I would probably warn for an inappropriate post, but surely the filter has to be working decently for avoiding the filter to apply - just my opinion.

[sex]

they obv not gna manually filter every possible combination with their current filter system -.-

u were all still knowingly avoiding the filter lol if u were smart like me u'd just quote the wrongdoers and walk away with a clean record x

SAME i had so much fun quoting lots

fxck right off i did not kick u ****basher

just testing filter xx

LMFAO

[David]

You certain its right ?
Remove it, save, add it back, save

Try that

Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk

you sound like tech support
"IS IT TURNED ON?"

[Casanova]

well there you go, human error

[Kardan]

fxck right off i did not kick u ****basher

just testing filter xx

Filter would never pick up fxck, but the rule about suggesting swearwords (Like we're not allowed to say f**k or **) would pick that up as a rulebreak.

[GoldenMerc]

The way I see it is that we don't want to see it on the forum - fair enough. But it was the filter's fault that it wasn't filtered - and the filter really should have filtered it. And when you type that, you WOULD expect the filter to pick that sort of thing up.

Personally I would have just edited the post, but not have issued a warning until the filter was updated. If people posted it multiple times, then I would probably warn for an inappropriate post, but surely the filter has to be working decently for avoiding the filter to apply - just my opinion.

I agree with most of this but its been used a bit more than just once, if someone said it then found out it was filtered and left it at that then ok but it wasnt

Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk

[Phil]

Bye m8


You certain its right ?
Remove it, save, add it back, save

Try that

Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk

I would but no clue how to access it lmao

Well there you go phil, thank me for showing you the fault of vbulletin.
you can say it privately, i won't embarrass you.

No idea what you're on about but thank you so so much you have no idea how much it means x

[The Don]

The way I see it is that we don't want to see it on the forum - fair enough. But it was the filter's fault that it wasn't filtered - and the filter really should have filtered it. And when you type that, you WOULD expect the filter to pick that sort of thing up.

Personally I would have just edited the post, but not have issued a warning until the filter was updated. If people posted it multiple times, then I would probably warn for an inappropriate post, but surely the filter has to be working decently for avoiding the filter to apply - just my opinion.

I didn't see what happened initially as I was at work, but I also agree that if done on accident it should just be edited out and be given the benefit of the doubt, however I would still class it as avoiding the filter.