
The rule isn't pointless, this thread is pointless. You want something somebody else has because you didn't get it, and think that because he's staff he gets special treatment. Talk about digging deep for excuses.
The lads likely to fail his trial now anyway now people have clicked on to the fact he used blackmarket sites to buy his username, and likely will continue to use them in the future.
B for effort anyway.
You caught me!
And? Yes, I do want a short username, and there doesn't actually appear to be any real reason why they are prohibited other than 'because other websites do it'. What's your point? Also "You want something somebody else has because you didn't get it" literally makes no sense. Because you didn't get it implies I wanted it regardless of him also having it, which completely contradicts the entire sentence.The rule isn't pointless, this thread is pointless. You want something somebody else has because you didn't get it, and think that because he's staff he gets special treatment. Talk about digging deep for excuses.
The lads likely to fail his trial now anyway now people have clicked on to the fact he used blackmarket sites to buy his username, and likely will continue to use them in the future.
B for effort anyway.
Last edited by The Don; 28-04-2014 at 01:30 AM.
That's when Ron vanished, came back speaking Spanish
Lavish habits, two rings, twenty carats
*Claims there's special treatment for staff members
*Told that the rule exceptions work for anyone staff or not
*Ignores the answer and makes a new claim that the rule is pointless despite having been made aware several times that the rule is in place for functional reasons and that the anomalies are so rare as to be totally unimportant
on the subject of usernames remove the requirement for community staff to have their habbo names as their forum names (it can b displayed easily elsewhere) and more people will apply!
I wasn't aware of the habbo name policy
errr did you completely miss kyles post on the previous page? The search function 'reason' has been debunked.*Told that the rule exceptions work for anyone staff or not
*Ignores the answer and makes a new claim that the rule is pointless despite having been made aware several times that the rule is in place for functional reasons and that the anomalies are so rare as to be totally unimportant
That's when Ron vanished, came back speaking Spanish
Lavish habits, two rings, twenty carats
What his post where he manually found the guy by clicking "B" on the user list as opposed to using search functions
So you don't like the reason they've given you lol, doesn't make it any less valid.You caught me!
And? Yes, I do want a short username, and there doesn't actually appear to be any real reason why they are prohibited other than 'because other websites do it'. What's your point? Also "You want something somebody else has because you didn't get it" literally makes no sense. Because you didn't get it implies I wanted it regardless of him also having it, which completely contradicts the entire sentence.
Also think you've misinterpreted what I'm saying, you've brought up the issue of one letter usernames based on somebody got one and you got rejected for wanting something similar. "Could choose a 3 letter username but why should I accept their totally valid reason, I'm gonna kick up a fuss instead" lol.
Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!