Post WWE News/Rumours/Results here.

[Arron]

It would be great if Brock could pull it off. He's expected to be fighting again in January. Y'never know!

[Lost_Addict]

Only credible opponents i can think of are John Cena (Debatable) Triple H (But then its mimmicked the taker/michaels storyline) Brock Lesnar (UFC) and Sting (TNA)

[Kasabian]

Only credible opponents i can think of are John Cena (Debatable) Triple H (But then its mimmicked the taker/michaels storyline) Brock Lesnar (UFC) and Sting (TNA)

No, No, Yes, No.

The WWE need to realise Cena isn't the majority of the fans favourite anymore. Triple H possibly won't wrestle again. Lesnar is rumoured(as discussed on here), and have you watched Sting in TNA!? He's ******* woeful, and way past it.

SCSA tweeted last night that the WWE need to sign up Samoa Joe when his TNA contract is up, I'd love to see this.

[Lost_Addict]

But John "Super" cena would make sence as he is the face of the company. he is known for being pretty much unbeatable. and your right theres not a majority fanbase for him, i for one hate the character, however it could be set up for Cena (Heel) vs. Undertaker (Face) for a year or so's time. It could easily be a storyline if Cena turns heel against The Rock, wins and then goes on to say he's done everything but beat the undertaker (Similar to The Games storyline). As for the Game, 1. He has stated that he is waiting for the undertakers return and 2. He has said that if the company needs him as a booster hes happy to step in the ring. Brock lesnar - we've all discussed about so yeh and Sting is only 5 years older than the dead man himself. And after all the hype of sting facing undertaker this year it seems almost obvious + Sting has told in an interview that a few months before wrestlemania the WWE offered him a short term contract

[Niall!]

Yeah, there's only one problem Addict. Cena is NEVER going to be heel again. EVER.

[Adam]

Why does it always have to be heel vs face? Taker, HHH and HBK are all faces and the last 3 streak matches have involved them. John Cena vs Taker wouldn't be a good match - their styles are just too contrasting. That said, Cena will never become heel again - if he wasn't heel in Chicago, he never will be.

Cena is not a credible opponent for Taker's 20-0 retired. The only way that could happen, anyway, is if Taker skipped WM28 and faced Cena at WM29 but then it's another year. He'll retire at 20-0 for sure anyway. Hopefully it's next year when I'm in attendance if not I'll be severely pissed lol.

[Misawa]

Give me Taker vs. Triple H 2 over any other match with an active competitor in WWE or TNA.

Lesnar and Taker have genuine beef. As far as them not having a feud in WWE, they did, and in culminated in a Hell in a Cell match at No Mercy 2002.

[Oleh]

Angle vs Taker WM 29. 19-1.

[Adam]

Angle vs Taker WM 29. 19-1.

Angle won't work with WWE after what happened towards the end of his tenure there, also he signed a new contract with TNA only in April.

It'd be Wrestlemania 28 unless you're on about Taker skipping one but he wouldn't do it, WWE wouldn't do it as The Streak is a massive draw for them. Also, Taker won't lose. There's no one worth losing to(o).

[You]

I doubt Taker will ever lose his WM stream but I remember him doing an interview sometime ago, saying if he needed to lose at WM to help a wrestler/WWE, then he would do. Would certainly be a huge shame if he did lose the streak as I doubt another wrestler would be able to rack up as much as Taker.