[PatzZ] [F-4 Phantom] [P@ND@ & NetzZ]

[nets]

It's a big alt and all, but to be honest I don't really like it. Shading is great and the idea of habbo planes isnt really that good. No offense, but I think you should leave the vehicle alts to corbyn

4/10 sorry

Corbyn is also good at making alterations of furni, buildings, habbo's - hes good at flash and I expect there are ton's of other stuff.
Just because you feel corbyn is better than us we shouldnt makeing vehical alts?

[nets]

As it WILL NOT Let me edit my previous post I would like to say I was ment to put the word 'be' between shouldnt and vehicle.

[Noul]

Its hard To Do, But Then Again The Shape Is Very Eadgy. Well done 9/10.

[Moose]

I see pixel errors, and i dont see the right wing... and the front is badly done.

[P@ND@]

Lol, Corbyn was the first one to see the fully finished plane Starberg.
I admit, Corbyn can do better, but he is 19, so he has loads of expierence.
I only started altering good alerations since 2/3 months.
And for as far as NetzZ concerns? I don't think he doesn't has that much expierence as Corbyn does, also, I do not see you doing better either.

Question: Do you see Habbo Limosines driving trough a Guest Room?
Answer: No..that would be stupid..it's to big..
Question: BUT! Corbyns idea is still good?
Answer: Indeedy Do! ^^
So the moral is: No vehicle could actually fit in Habbo..
BUT! There could be a sort off, let's say, game including a F-4 Phantom, or a Flash Movie including the Limosuine.I'll leave the other thinkingwork to you.
-
And there are no pixel errors as Brandon may say, I have checked everything several times and everything is as it should be.
Even the Criss Cross lines on the shading, Even the "eadgy" wings or how ever you'd call them, even the damn tail!
Also before publishing we showed at least 12 people the plane wich include 3 off this Forum Pixel Artists and they did not see errors, neither did I or NetzZ.
-
Even while making it we showed it several times, so anybody who would assume this was stolen, you are rong, people who could prove that are:
simplesimon12, PiXeLwAvE (aka Z3R0V!C), Corbyn, Darkangel909, Hyperghost and Danny6600

Note: Do not take this defending text of your accusements as an insult.

To the other members of this forum: I thank you for these wonderfulle ratings.Even whit the 4 from Starberg and 8 from Alex, we have an average of 9.5+ ^^

Big Panda Hug To Everyone!
(")(^^)(")

[nets]

I think some of the people might think it has pixel errors because its not 2 along one down.
But its not, its just complicated - rounded objects would be 2 pixels along one down, but this is a rounded object which gets bigger in the middle.
Not only can you not just draw along 2 pixels 1 down, but you have to keep it all at the right size.
Try drawing something like it in paint, youl find its extremely hard.

Also there are many other people who can prove its not stolen as I have showed about 6 people while it was being made.

[Moose]

I see one, here, If its like the other side, its not accurately done, and therfore its an error =]

[nets]

I dont know if you mean by a pixel not being there?
If so thats fixed, if its the wing going down, thats right - the wing gos down the middle, and what you see a bit of is the lower bit of what will turn into the small wing.

[P@ND@]

I see one, here, If its like the other side, its not accurately done, and therfore its an error =]

Brandon,posts are here uneditable, therefor, if you review the image we posted, the error YOU CREATED is not there.
How're you feeling now, a bit embarresed? ^^

[David1-2-3]

Wow-Wee , Thats Awesome ,
Very Nice , 9.9/10