Moutain Dew!

[--ss--]

It does indeed sorry to tell you.

O.o really ? i feel sorry for the mountdeolics

[Lyca]

It isnt true.

Phew :eusa_danc

[Dodevu23]

Yeah, I love mountain dew, same when I go holiday to America.

[HUGECOOL]

Since the argument, or lack thereof, is getting repetitive and pretty boring, and you’ve once again failed to provide new content to the table, there’s no solid issue to discuss. A basic summary of your previous post would be:

“Oh no, insult”- *ad hominem article*
- Reiteration of past thoughts, but phrased differently.

What the hell is your tactic, to say things over again until you bore me to death? You almost sound like President Bush, except his spelling is most likely better.

Well whomever you copyed and pasted that off must have failed quite badly, You cannot know somthing unless it is true, you can only belive it. Belife does not make knolage...
I KNOW, becuse i have tasted it. You DONT know, but belive it so, even thogh you have not.
But knolage is truth, belife is not.

Oh, guess what? I got this excerpt from your beloved Wikipedia which, may I add, can be edited by anyone. Search for Epistemology and read away. The basis of epistemology is that knowledge lies in between truth and belief, but that is irrelevant now that I just noticed something- You interpreted my post incorrectly.

Should I surprise? Not at all- it’s you we’re talking about, after all.

What I actually said was, “Well, we wouldn’t know. Not many of us have tried stagnant pond water.” = We (people in the thread and/or forum) have not acquired a taste for pond water; therefore, we are unaware of what it tastes like. However, you once again, failed by misinterpreting information and portraying the post as though I was implying that you have tasted it, which I didn’t. So, this whole little spat has been completely obsolete. Maybe if you didn’t read like such a mentally challenged halfwit, we wouldn’t even be discussing this. Ah, the many wonders of Habbox Forum- the short-bus of the Internet.

Only 66 spelling errors in your post? Going for a personal best, I see.

[Mentor]

Since the argument, or lack thereof, is getting repetitive and pretty boring, and you’ve once again failed to provide new content to the table, there’s no solid issue to discuss. A basic summary of your previous post would be:

“Oh no, insult”- *ad hominem article*
- Reiteration of past thoughts, but phrased differently.

What the hell is your tactic, to say things over again until you bore me to death? You almost sound like President Bush, except his spelling is most likely better.



Oh, guess what? I got this excerpt from your beloved Wikipedia which, may I add, can be edited by anyone. Search for Epistemology and read away. The basis of epistemology is that knowledge lies in between truth and belief, but that is irrelevant now that I just noticed something- You interpreted my post incorrectly.

Should I surprise? Not at all- it’s you we’re talking about, after all.

What I actually said was, “Well, we wouldn’t know. Not many of us have tried stagnant pond water.” = We (people in the thread and/or forum) have not acquired a taste for pond water; therefore, we are unaware of what it tastes like. However, you once again, failed by misinterpreting information and portraying the post as though I was implying that you have tasted it, which I didn’t. So, this whole little spat has been completely obsolete. Maybe if you didn’t read like such a mentally challenged halfwit, we wouldn’t even be discussing this. Ah, the many wonders of Habbox Forum- the short-bus of the Internet.

Only 66 spelling errors in your post? Going for a personal best, I see.

Well Ive pointed out the logical falisy your useing enogh times already, if your to far up your own **** or just to stupid to understand the point i cant see much use in pointing it out any more.

If "You" or "we" or what ever grouping or person you wish to name hasnt tasted it, Then you have no way of saying what it does or does not taste like.
Hence why you cannot use that to say i am incorrect in my verdict on what it does or does not taste like.

Your orignal coment was implying that becuse you haddent tasted in and found this likeness i must be wrong. Althogh i may have simply been giveing you to much credit on the abilty to utalise inplications and had therefor infered somthing that wasnt there. Which would basicly sum up to the second point of my orgnal counter.
The Post was Pointless and stupid, it was Spam, it made no differentaion eather way.
It did not add any point or peace of informtaion, attack or deffend a point, Just raw spam.

Since you have more aless confimed it as spam, i shall accept its spam, and you can accept your presuose mountin due tastes the same as pond water.

Argument over, ok. If you want to counter this, you would have to admit my first assumtion was right which simply proves you have no grasp on simple logic and are as you seem to be showing a compleat and utter idiot.

Now, You can insult me all you like, you wrong, i right, you ****ed of, i dont cair. Have a nice day

ps. I must truely pitty you, if you seriosly have nothing better to do in your time than count my spelling mistakes lol

[HUGECOOL]

Well Ive pointed out the logical falisy your useing enogh times already, if your to far up your own **** or just to stupid to understand the point i cant see much use in pointing it out any more.

If "You" or "we" or what ever grouping or person you wish to name hasnt tasted it, Then you have no way of saying what it does or does not taste like.
Hence why you cannot use that to say i am incorrect in my verdict on what it does or does not taste like.

Your orignal coment was implying that becuse you haddent tasted in and found this likeness i must be wrong. Althogh i may have simply been giveing you to much credit on the abilty to utalise inplications and had therefor infered somthing that wasnt there. Which would basicly sum up to the second point of my orgnal counter.
The Post was Pointless and stupid, it was Spam, it made no differentaion eather way.
It did not add any point or peace of informtaion, attack or deffend a point, Just raw spam.

Since you have more aless confimed it as spam, i shall accept its spam, and you can accept your presuose mountin due tastes the same as pond water.

Argument over, ok. If you want to counter this, you would have to admit my first assumtion was right which simply proves you have no grasp on simple logic and are as you seem to be showing a compleat and utter idiot.

Now, You can insult me all you like, you wrong, i right, you ****ed of, i dont cair. Have a nice day

ps. I must truely pitty you, if you seriosly have nothing better to do in your time than count my spelling mistakes lol

Lol! There you go again with your equivocatory argument. My argument hadno logical fallacy because you interpreted it incorrectly.

·

If "You" or "we" or what ever grouping or person you wish to name hasnt tasted it, Then you have no way of saying what it does or does not taste like..

That’s what I’ve been trying to tell you, idiot! Because we have not tasted it, we have no way of telling what pond water tastes like. Are you following so far?
·

Hence why you cannot use that to say i am incorrect in my verdict on what it does or does not taste like

I never denied that you had not tasted pond water. NOT being key word.

Your orignal coment was implying that becuse you haddent tasted in and found this likeness i must be wrong.

No, it was not implying anything, and you victimized yourself in vain. My only goal with my original comment was to get a point across to you that we have no knowledge whatsoever of what pond water tastes like, not that you were unaware of what it tasted like- I could care less.

Argument over, ok. If you want to counter this, you would have to admit my first assumtion was right which simply proves you have no grasp on simple logic and are as you seem to be showing a compleat and utter idiot.

I’ve already shown you where you were wrong. Whether you’ll accept that fact or not is up to you. Lol. I don’t believe Wikipedia has an article concerning your idiocy with that comment.
You know, we would save so much time if every time you wanted to start another circular argument you’d say that I was right.
Sorry, but I have better things to do than to count your grammatical fallacies, however, Microsoft Word has done it for me as it is near impossible absorbing the content of your atrocious writing skills without proper corrections.

[Mentor]

Lol! There you go again with your equivocatory argument. My argument hadno logical fallacy because you interpreted it incorrectly.

· That’s what I’ve been trying to tell you, idiot! Because we have not tasted it, we have no way of telling what pond water tastes like. Are you following so far?
· I never denied that you had not tasted pond water. NOT being key word.



No, it was not implying anything, and you victimized yourself in vain. My only goal with my original comment was to get a point across to you that we have no knowledge whatsoever of what pond water tastes like, not that you were unaware of what it tasted like- I could care less.
I’ve already shown you where you were wrong. Whether you’ll accept that fact or not is up to you. Lol. I don’t believe Wikipedia has an article concerning your idiocy with that comment.
You know, we would save so much time if every time you wanted to start another circular argument you’d say that I was right.
Sorry, but I have better things to do than to count your grammatical fallacies, however, Microsoft Word has done it for me as it is near impossible absorbing the content of your atrocious writing skills without proper corrections.

Yea, i know im right, everyone who reads this knows im right. You im not so bothered about. feel free to delude yourself and insult me all you like

[HUGECOOL]

Yea, i know im right, everyone who reads this knows im right. You im not so bothered about. feel free to delude yourself and insult me all you like

They say denial is the way a human protects itself from knowledge that they don't wish to be aware of.

[Mentor]

They say denial is the way a human protects itself from knowledge that they don't wish to be aware of.

I suppose that accounts for your actions "/ but as i said delude away

[HUGECOOL]

I suppose that accounts for your actions "/ but as i said delude away

Was that a conclusion, or did just get tired of thinking?