How Many Infractions Do U Have ?

[:James:]

A grand total of 0.

[kasi]

one .

[Neversoft]

They would learn because they would realise anyway they try to avoid the filter it will be filtered.

It is not saying people can aviod the filter because you would be filtering their words.

The only thing I disagree with is when someone is being damn right offensive, they should be warned and banned for that. But swearing that's just petty, if you were alowed to swear on this people would get borred of it and not take much notice anyway.

No, seriously. They would not learn. Some of the people on this forum never learn even with the rules being as they are.

[Nemo]

7 woohoo =l

[brandon]

I got 2 infractions... but it was after they decided to put a 6 month limit on them. Phew.

Actually, you have 1 infraction and 1 warning. Only the infraction counts as 1 point

[ZL2.]

Ant (Forum Moderator) Please do not pointless post

[::d4nnyt::]

No, seriously. They would not learn. Some of the people on this forum never learn even with the rules being as they are.

The only one way to stop rule breaking is to abolish rules.

Obviously this isn't practical but some of the rules on here are a bit naff. I mean you get an infraction for being off topic but it's totally okay for people to have signatures that exceed the height of a 1024 px window, I can tell which is far more anoying.

I don't like the way they nit pick through all of the threads doing what seems like "Looking" for reasons to infract people. I think that people should only get infracted if a post is reported. That way you can prove that it is offensive to someone or actually anoying someone.

Also the reason for infracting someone for a pointless post is that it is anoying and gets in the way (yeh?). So whats the point in infracting the person above for posting a pointless post, and then leaving the post there!!!! it hasn't solved anything.

[Jerremykle!]

three atm

[Neversoft]

Ant (Forum Moderator) Please do not pointless post

LOL! Bet you got an infraction/warning for that?

The only one way to stop rule breaking is to abolish rules.

Obviously this isn't practical but some of the rules on here are a bit naff. I mean you get an infraction for being off topic but it's totally okay for people to have signatures that exceed the height of a 1024 px window, I can tell which is far more anoying.

I don't like the way they nit pick through all of the threads doing what seems like "Looking" for reasons to infract people. I think that people should only get infracted if a post is reported. That way you can prove that it is offensive to someone or actually anoying someone.

Also the reason for infracting someone for a pointless post is that it is anoying and gets in the way (yeh?). So whats the point in infracting the person above for posting a pointless post, and then leaving the post there!!!! it hasn't solved anything.

I see where you're going, but I don't see the rules being abolished any time soon.

[jord&clar]

i have a warning.