I wouldn't normaly but as they are making nuclear weapons , yes I would back it.
I don't agree on them killing inicient people but they might destroy the earth with the weapons.
I wouldn't normaly but as they are making nuclear weapons , yes I would back it.
I don't agree on them killing inicient people but they might destroy the earth with the weapons.
I have to agree with you there, the nuclear bombing is kind of irrelivent and it wont be used over somthing which can be sorted by talking.No, because it can be solved without violence. The old Iranian hostage crisis was a different story because that was actual violence. This hostage crisis is pretty much just Iran crying out for attention. The only thing the hostages are suffering from is boredom. They'll let them go eventually, they're just being stubborn. No need for hundreds maybe thousands of people die for something you can just let go. And as for nuclear weapons, no nation smart enough to actual get nuclear weapons actually uses them, because the U.S. has enough to destroy the world 15 times over. Everyone's got the bomb. I've got the bomb. Keep it under my bed.
The point is that war should ALWAYS be last resort. Everything else must fail, or there must be no other safe options. In this case, there are clearly options.
they arnt making nukes atm they have none as it says in wikipedia. the fact of the matter of the nukes was iran signed all these "non nuke" forms etc but made the nukes anyway without un concent. instead the iranians said it was for power but they were found out. THEY ARNT MAKING NUKES NOW![]()
Owner Of The-Red-Help-CenterI became Productions staff on the 28/1/07I became Events Organiser Trialist on 22/2/07Final Fantasy - Square Enix rulesTo Zanarkand:To Zanarkand - Orchestra:I owe rep to: X:RiX:X